X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTP id 2963407 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:32:07 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.146.182; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j40so2733435wah.1 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:31:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=qk8n2k02vWBXEh2+BV+jjO0EFDr0mtUYQJzRYptPwfo=; b=F+1EV241hP95JwlSR6K6jBi4c04SU6QB7b9EjCo6sp0lDCIJufWREOhj1cP/LeW29Z 6P/SuPpNw3dAP35aJLg2L+GmIZi4bA4ju0OOHSPFJmB37iV1lzMa6U40EExWE5YT1OqD ItSA1la54jR8N8CU+6d6dvuobktcpXo+4lB4s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=e2CsCTxKoh/HcDe4+qTZRiRdDGK716BABQaA5E9zCNCWyCoz5B0lR29RtRwLrMSwqk 4bCVTZbudvlPCP0zcznW3xJoMDO9URfrzG4fd3vGKDa7UAxMbytOlZGbRcPI/aYi5rRS s6uzGkaNyvqE8UW56DbXAXcD1fIFlwWaXGkrs= Received: by 10.115.48.15 with SMTP id a15mr77349wak.217.1213205481860; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.92.5 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b4b137c0806111031r7e35d8fcgd66f1f2782299302@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:31:21 -0400 From: "Tracy Crook" Sender: rwstracy@gmail.com To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Muffler design In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17558_17142333.1213205481879" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 34cc3a32ab20c977 ------=_Part_17558_17142333.1213205481879 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline The one I used never failed. Still looks good as new after about 200 hours. Will install it on the 20B if the Hushpower II doesn't hold up. Tracy On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Joe Berki wrote: > How long did the spin tech last before it failed? Is anyone runnitn one > of these? > > Joe Berki > Limo EZ > ------=_Part_17558_17142333.1213205481879 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
The one I used never failed.  Still looks good as new after about 200 hours.  Will install it on the 20B if the Hushpower II doesn't hold up.
 
Tracy

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Joe Berki <jskmberki@alltel.net> wrote:
How long did the spin tech last before it failed?  Is anyone runnitn one of these?
 
Joe Berki
Limo EZ

------=_Part_17558_17142333.1213205481879--