The following was posted on the Mistral-Engines web site. It is another
data point on the very harsh environment of the exhaust system, particularly in
the NA engines.
Giff Marr
LIV-P/Mistral 70%
More fear than harm
07 June 2008
On Tuesday morning, 3rd of June, our test pilot, Mr Stephen Roth,
took off for a first one-hour flight that went flawlessly. He landed at
Palatka’s Kay Larkin Field
Airport, Florida, to
refuel. Pre-take-off checks were normal and so was take-off. On initial climb,
however, the engine started to lose power while still running perfectly
smoothly. The pilot performed a 180° turn to return to the airport. The loss of
power increased, and the pilot was unable to maintain altitude.
He landed the plane under control and at minimal airspeed in a
wooded area to avoid buildings and houses. The wings were sheared off, one of
them staying in a tree, and the fuselage fell sideways onto the ground. Coming
to his rescue, two courageous citizens helped him out of the cockpit conscious
and unharmed. There was no post-crash fire, only smoke from engine coolant
leaking onto the heat exhaust.
MISTRAL Engines is extremely happy and most relieved to announce
that Stephen Roth suffers only from minor cuts and bruises. After a thorough
check in the hospital, which proved to be short, he was released and able to go
back to the site to contribute to the beginning FAA enquiry.
MISTRAL Engines immediately dispatched to the site Mr Gordon
Anderson, its Chief Operating Officer. On Thursday 5th of June, Mr Anderson, Mr
Roth and the FAA investigator inspected the plane’s wreckage as well as
the whole engine data log which was retrieved entirely uncompromised from
MISTRAL’s proprietary Digital Engine Management (DEM) system.
It was quickly evident that all engine parameters were normal from
the moment of take-off to the moment of the accident, with the exception of
abnormally low propeller RPM. The cause of the power loss was subsequently
found in the failure of the internals of the exhaust system’s muffler,
obstructing the free flow of exhaust gases from the engine.
This particular muffler was a temporary and experimental solution
developed and manufactured by a third party, which was planned to be replaced
this coming summer by a certifiable unit, developed in-house. The FAA, acting
on behalf of the NTSB1, retained the muffler in order to conduct flow tests.
A preliminary report was produced by MISTRAL Engines. It will be
posted on this website shortly. A final company report will be issued after
further analysis of the engine is conducted at MISTRAL’s facility in Geneva.
After its pilot emerging unscarred from this mishap, MISTRAL is
extremely relieved that its technology is proven uninvolved in the cause of the
accident and that, through the innovative data logging capability of its DEM
system, it was able to significantly contribute to a prompt and thorough
determination of the causes.
MISTRAL Engines is in the process of acquiring a new airframe to
resume its flight testing programme as soon as possible, and the type
certification programme of its G-300 engine model continues unhindered.
1 NTSB : National Transportation Safety Board