X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nlpi015.prodigy.net ([207.115.36.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTP id 2956690 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:06:10 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.115.36.44; envelope-from=panzera@experimental-aviation.com Received: from cdibmpat2 (adsl-76-250-177-126.dsl.frs2ca.sbcglobal.net [76.250.177.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by nlpi015.prodigy.net (8.13.8 smtpauth/dk/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m56J5RxU025941 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:05:30 -0500 From: "Patrick Panzera" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] More rotary uses? [FlyRotary] Titanium rotary? [FlyRotary] Re: Big engines Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:05:28 -0700 Message-ID: <006901c8c808$48efae60$1801a8c0@cd.constructiondesigns.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcjH7pLabYh7QRtVSGW5bbxsv19YqgAGM6vQ Since the rotary is a four-stroke engine, energy would be wasted on the compression stroke. You might get away with using turbochargers for this application. Pat > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On > Behalf Of Schemmel, Grant > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:00 AM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] More rotary uses? [FlyRotary] Titanium rotary? > [FlyRotary] Re: Big engines > > > What with rising energy costs, I've been kicking around an idea for > creating a solar-thermal generator system. If you're not familiar with > the solar-thermal idea, it uses solar energy concentrated through a > reflector to heat a pipe containing either oil or water in order to make > steam. You could use the waste heat to actually heat your house too > (co-generation). In looking for something on the order of a > micro-turbine, it occurred to me that since the rotary acts like a > turbine, couldn't you plumb it to run on steam? > > I was thinking that maybe if you position the ports correctly, you might > be able to power two sides of a rotor at once: Side A would be feeding > steam in through the normal intake port, then exhaust out through a > p-port somewhere around the leading sparkplug location; Side B would be > feeding steam in through a new port somewhere around the trailing > sparkplug and exhausting out the normal exhaust port. > > I'm pretty sure this would work for one side, but I'm not so sure about > two sides at once. I have a '91 turbo 13B that I'm intending to go into > a BD4 someday, but have not gotten around to tearing it down, so I'm not > intimately familiar with Wankel timing yet. What do those of you who > have a lot more experience with the engine think of the idea? > > Grant Schemmel > Penrose, CO > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On > Behalf Of Ed Anderson > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 8:06 AM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Titanium rotary? [FlyRotary] Re: Big engines > > Always interesting to hear of excursions from the stock 2 rotor format. > > Does anyone recall the gent who was going to make a rotary engine out > of titanium? As best I recall I believe he actually had a rotor tact > welded reportedly out of titanium plate - there were some photos. I > doubted at the time that anything would come of it, but it was > interesting to see what some folks are willing to tackle. > > Ed > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ernest Christley" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:59 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Big engines > > > > Lynn Hanover wrote: > >> In this case you could machine away one face or both faces and braze > two > >> rotors together. One end with the gear and the other without. You > could > >> have > >> twice the bearing length, and nearly twice the displacement. > >> > >> Just the crank, rotors and housings would be special. Everything else > > >> could > >> be stock pieces. Maybe double the torque, could be direct drive? > >> > > Those voices keep talking to me. > > > > Could you use two rotor housings, brazed then pinned on the > compression > > side? Then they wouldn't really need to be special either, and you'd > get > > FOUR plugs per cylinder. > > > > Side seals would be standard, but would the apex seals have to be > special > > made...or could you use two of those side-by-side? > > > > You would have to have either a monster bridge port or a peripheral > port > > to feed the monster. > > > > Renesis rotor housings probably wouldn't work. The side exhaust would > be > > to restrictive for twice the volume. > > > > You'd need to build a new oil pan, or use a remote sump. Simple. > Special > > made compression bolts are also a cinch. > > > > On a guess, you'd be adding about 15lbs per rotor (?). It could > possibly > > end up being a 400Hp engine with an installed weight under 350lbs(?). > > > > -- > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > Archive and UnSub: > > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > Notice: This e-mail is intended solely for use of the individual or entity > to which it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, > privileged, company confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under > applicable law. If the reader is not the intended recipient or agent > responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication is strictly prohibited. If this communication has been > transmitted from a U.S. location it may also contain data subject to the > International Traffic in Arms Regulations or U.S. Export Administration > Regulations and cannot be disseminated, distributed or copied to foreign > nationals, residing in the U.S. or abroad, without the prior approval of > the U.S. Department of State or appropriate export licensing authority. If > you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by > reply e-mail or collect telephone call and delete or destroy all copies of > this e-mail message, any physical copies made of this e-mail message > and/or any file attachment(s). > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html