X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPS id 2955266 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:25:46 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,597,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="10276235" Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2008 17:25:04 -0400 Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m55LP4oQ024624 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:25:04 -0400 Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m55LP7Hn008945 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:25:07 GMT Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:25:04 -0400 Received: from [10.82.216.142] ([10.82.216.142]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:25:04 -0400 Message-ID: <484859B1.2090400@nc.rr.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:25:05 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Rotor face temps References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jun 2008 21:25:04.0338 (UTC) FILETIME=[9EAC0B20:01C8C752] Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=echristley@nc.rr.com; dkim=neutral Kelly Troyer wrote: > Lynn, > A simple drawing would help my old brain visualize what the rotor > would look like for a 4 rotor engine on a 2 lobe excentric shaft.......I > presume the rotors would be geared differently to the stationary gears > to maintain the various cycles........ > > Think of a rotor and housing that is twice as fat. Everything else is the same. (exept for the shaft that has to expand in one spot to accept the fat rotor). Lynn, On the idea of using one rotor as a boost for the others. Wouldn't it have to either be larger, or be geared to run faster? If you wanted to run 5lbs of boost, for instance, that is a 1/3rd increase in air pressure from ambient. You couldn't just run the exhaust from the front rotor into the rear, because the two are pumping the same volume. You'd the the front rotor to be 1/3rd wider so that it would displace that much more air. Ok. Maybe I'm the one hearing voices from the shop.