X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTP id 2930459 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 20 May 2008 10:37:18 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=75.180.132.123; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 ([75.191.186.236]) by cdptpa-omta05.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20080520143638.JIZL8238.cdptpa-omta05.mail.rr.com@edward2> for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 14:36:38 +0000 Message-ID: <001301c8ba86$eee61820$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Hushpower muffler update Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:36:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01C8BA65.678A4FC0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C8BA65.678A4FC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, Bill Yes, I have two but they may be sharing the load, so was interested if = any other single muffler use was having a problem. I know Tracy has = not, but then he's flying the Renesis which is undoubtedly easier on the = mufflers. Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bill Eslick=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 10:07 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Hushpower muffler update Ed, I have had my Hushpower installed for 200+ hours, and no problems. I = have the NA block with splitters, so I suspect that helps with the = longevity issue. Bill Eslick RV-6 13B NA 550+ hours http://tinyurl.com/6r88kj On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Ed Anderson = wrote: Anyone else having a problem with the Hushpower II other than Jason? I have two on my installation and they have worked fine (so far) and = I have the turbo block without the exhaust splitters making for a pretty = powerful exhaust pulse. =20 Ed ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C8BA65.678A4FC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks, Bill
 
Yes, I have two but they may be sharing = the load,=20 so was interested if any other single muffler use was having a = problem.  I=20 know Tracy has not, but then he's flying the Renesis which is = undoubtedly easier=20 on the mufflers.
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Bill = Eslick=20
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 = 10:07=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Hushpower=20 muffler update

Ed,

I have had my Hushpower installed for 200+ = hours,=20 and no problems.  I have the NA block with splitters, so I = suspect that=20 helps with the longevity issue.

Bill Eslick
RV-6 13B NA 550+ = hours
http://tinyurl.com/6r88kj

<= BR>
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Ed Anderson = <eanderson@carolina.rr.com&g= t;=20 wrote:
Anyone else having a problem with = the=20 Hushpower II other than Jason?
 
I have two on my installation and = they have=20 worked fine (so far) and I have the turbo block without the exhaust=20 splitters making for a pretty powerful exhaust pulse.  =
 
Ed


------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C8BA65.678A4FC0--