X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from neon.toast.net ([65.203.23.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTP id 2925525 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 May 2008 18:35:13 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.203.23.149; envelope-from=rjechtinaw@toast.net Received: from dialup-4.229.162.82.Dial1.Detroit1.Level3.net (unverified [4.229.162.82]) by neon.toast.net (Vircom SMTPRS 4.5.654.0) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 18:34:29 -0400 X-Modus-BlackList: 4.229.162.82=OK;rjechtinaw@toast.net=OK X-Modus-Trusted: 4.229.162.82=NO X-Modus-Audit: FALSE;0;0;0 Message-Id: From: randy echtinaw To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Drawing Programs? Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 18:34:26 -0400 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Rusty, I use DeltaCad. I think it runs about $30 and is downloadable. =20= Easy to learn and use. For a novice it is great. For a real CAD man it =20= is cumbersome and slow. Randy On May 16, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Russell Duffy wrote: > Greetings, > > Can anyone recommend a great drawing program? My idea of =93great=94 = is =20 > something that=92s intuitive enough that I won=92t need to enroll in =20= > night classes for 8 weeks to learn how to use it. Being able to =20 > work with AutoCAD drawings would be almost essential, since that=92s =20= > the most common format drawings seem to appear in I believe. I=92ve =20= > barely ever touched a CAD program, but there have been countless =20 > time when I wished I could just whip out a drawing like so many of =20 > you do routinely. Clearly, cheaper is better, but I=92m not opposed =20= > to spending money for the right program. > > Thanks, > Rusty (may be some T-34 parts in my yard)