Return-Path: Received: from web13102.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.174.147] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with SMTP id 2715524 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 08 Nov 2003 20:34:33 -0500 Message-ID: <20031109013431.88324.qmail@web13102.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.93.39.254] by web13102.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 08 Nov 2003 17:34:31 PST Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 17:34:31 -0800 (PST) From: Scott Subject: Evaporator Cores for slow planes? To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Good Evening... >From my readings of print and posts past I thought I understood evaporator cores were not appropriate for aircraft which travel at around 130mph or less. However, Ed Anderson recently posted "...with the engine idling at 2000 rpm, you would need the equivalent of a 15 mph wind through the cores to maintain adequate cooling. ..." This statement starts me down the path( again ) of again considering evap cores instead of the stock radiator. Thus, with that preface what is the consensus on what the airspeed range is when evap cores are not the best choice and something like the stock radiator is more appropriate. Thank You. -Scott ===== Thank You. Regards, Scott Stout http://home.att.net/~the_stouts_zenith_801 __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree