X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.244] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.2) with ESMTP id 2865258 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:51:14 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.132.244; envelope-from=cozy4pilot@gmail.com Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b2so437543ana.81 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:50:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:reply-to:from:to:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:importance; bh=nFX+XQVfSPlWvterFycdrCV49ZrfRUI5osjJ7odXJOk=; b=BpHqKKKmkJoDDJ9anopIT22+AgtDrr5NW0zYQlX+4bHwUZR0vBniVJ37h4csyGgvp2lG6xQMIMkmpuRC6a7OWrNu2zDgJ2fmM7nAaUtcdQJ3a5Wt3oVWzaoP2qT8mw5DA21s0TAhuZNNu1r0dXIIyVNw3WF9TJLqXxa33Kccihg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=reply-to:from:to:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:importance; b=h78rjM9C2dELaKISqU/vaJ4wt9LoZgWgP//V3mS4fkFuK/SO1UeaPoYMZCWy+cffnD8v+/nlxC42Gz7CMNSn/nIjITIxWMMP6d421DpXc0cnRODgi2gsfKAJ34V9j6fWbRSi/0XR3a0WwL+mqZr7Q7LJ935Jn/zECEtB4gA7h24= Received: by 10.100.215.14 with SMTP id n14mr4968896ang.110.1208771433163; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from HomePC ( [71.50.127.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i51sm3306624rne.7.2008.04.21.02.50.31 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:50:31 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: From: "Steve Brooks" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: New Radiator Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:44:40 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00E9_01C8A372.CAD030E0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 Importance: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00E9_01C8A372.CAD030E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I actually had thought about that, but with the shroud, it would impede the air flow, I would think. Although, if the inlet duct was the same size as the fan diameter, which is 15", it would still be larger that the actual air inlet itself. Perhaps that is an option. Regards, Steve Brooks -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of neilak@sympatico.ca Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 6:20 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Radiator Steve, Cooling fans work just as well on the front of the rad as they do on the back. Just a thought.. Neil K. _____ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Steve Brooks Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 2:57 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New Radiator Ed, It is hard to beat $5 each. Tapp wasn't too bad at all on the radiator though. The radiator itself was $375 plus shipping. I just got back fro the airport. I tore out the old evaporator cores and fiberglass plenum. The new radiator is too big to fit the way Intended. The actual radiator, as I found out, is actually 15.75 by 22.75. Slightly larger than the dimensions I gave them, but even at 22" it wouldn't go in as I intended to mount it. I'm going to have to mount it more horizontal. By relocating the fuel filters and fuel pumps, I can get about a 30 degree angle, and enough spacing to get a diffuser built that should do a good job of air distribution. The bad news is that I won't be able to put the cooling fan in as I planned for ground operation. I'll have to come up with a different plan for it. Regards, Steve Brooks ------=_NextPart_000_00E9_01C8A372.CAD030E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I actually had thought about that, but with the shroud, it would = impede the air flow, I would think.  = Although, if the inlet duct was the same size as the fan diameter, which is = 15”, it would still be larger that the actual air inlet itself.  Perhaps that is an = option.

 

Regards,

Steve Brooks

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of neilak@sympatico.ca
Sent: Sunday, April 20, = 2008 6:20 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = New Radiator

 

Steve,=

 =

   = ;         Cooling fans work just as well on the front of the rad as they do on the = back…

 =

Just a = thought..

 =

Neil = K.

 =


From: Rotary motors = in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Steve Brooks
Sent: Sunday, April 20, = 2008 2:57 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = New Radiator

 <= /p>

Ed,

It is hard to beat $5 each.  Tapp wasn’t too bad at = all on the radiator though.  The radiator itself was $375 plus shipping.  = I just got back fro the airport.  I tore out the old evaporator cores and fiberglass plenum.  The new radiator is too big to fit the way Intended.  The actual radiator, as I found out, is actually 15.75 = by 22.75.  Slightly larger than the dimensions I gave them, but even = at 22” it wouldn’t go in as I intended to mount = it.

I’m going to have to mount it more horizontal.  By = relocating the fuel filters and fuel pumps, I can get about a 30 degree angle, and = enough spacing to get a diffuser built that should do a good job of air distribution.  The bad news is that I won’t be able to put = the cooling fan in as I planned for ground operation.  I’ll have to come up = with a different plan for it.

 

Regards,

Steve Brooks

------=_NextPart_000_00E9_01C8A372.CAD030E0--