X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <dale.r@cox.net>
Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1)
  with ESMTP id 2552634 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:14:48 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.39; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net
Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75])
          by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP
          id <20071203021407.CGUO23849.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:14:07 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([72.223.44.63])
	by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp
	id L2E51Y00N1Mmy9C0000000; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:14:05 -0500
Message-ID: <47536677.1010803@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:14:15 -0700
From: Dale Rogers <dale.r@cox.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Hard starting - the saga continues
References: <list-2552578@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-2552578@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ed Anderson wrote:
> Lets not forget that injectors can be a problem, although they are 
> frequently suspect but seldom indicted {:>)
>
> Well, I'll think about it a bit more, but all out of suggestions at 
> this point.
>

Suggestion - to eliminate the injectors as "the" problem - swap the 
rotor #2 injectors with the rotor #1 injectors.  Does the problem stay 
with the rotor or move with the injectors?

Dale R.
Field Service Engineer
Hewlett-Packard Co.