Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #40558
From: George Lendich <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Giving up on single rotor
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:05:05 +1000
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Al,
It sounds like you might be right - but I wish I had an idea of what your talking about in regard to torque V angle of deflection.
I do my best but you have me beat on this one.
George ( down under)
----- Original Message -----
From: Al Wick
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 1:19 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Giving up on single rotor

Instead of using durometer in this case. I think it would be better to measure torque vs. angle of deflection. Using torque wrench and simple angle measure device. If you graphed this, you would end up with a chart that defines frequency response of the damper. Goal to have damper frequency response that's out of phase with the worst torsional pulses.
 
Once you've measured frequency response, you could then tune it with durometer tweaks. So you might end up with 2 dampers at 50 durometer, 2 at 40, to obtain your ideal frequency response of system.
 
I've always been drawn to having damper that has more than one frequency response. You never see designs like that. So with mild TV, it would respond one way. Suddenly it would have different response with larger TV. Both responses out of phase. They use this method with electronics and I've seen a few auto clutch dampers utilizing the concept.
 
FWIW
 
al wick
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 10:46 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Giving up on single rotor

Righ-t-o Rusty!
Thanks
George ( down under)
So what durometer is your gut feeling now that you went this far? 
 
Hi George,
 
I don't think you can compare the durometer of one damper to another, because the physical size is as important as the hardness of the rubber.  The Autoflight drive uses a stock Centaflex coupler that's only available in 50 and 60 durometer.  It's a fairly large diameter, and thick coupler.  50 was better than 60, but two 50's (effectively 25) in series was way too soft.  Maybe a 40 would be good, but it doesn't exist.  
 
Richard seems to be having better luck with the Hirth drive.  Two strokes are rough at low rpms, so perhaps they already have the right damper for the job.  I also suspect his engine has softer power pulses at low rpms.  It's a 12A for one, and PP for another.  PP is great at high rpms, but not know for good power down low.  It's the best theory I have.  
 
Cheers,
Rusty  


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.11/1161 - Release Date: 30/11/2007 12:12 PM
-Al Wick
Cozy IV powered by Turbo Subaru 3.0R with variable valve lift and cam timing.
Artificial intelligence in cockpit, N9032U 240+ hours from Portland, Oregon
Glass panel design, Subaru install, Prop construct, Risk assessment info:
http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.11/1161 - Release Date: 30/11/2007 12:12 PM
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster