X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mx06.syd.iprimus.net.au ([210.50.76.235] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2551335 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:18:29 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=210.50.76.235; envelope-from=daval@iprimus.com.au X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAB6WUUc6s9zb/2dsb2JhbAAI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.23,239,1194181200"; d="scan'208";a="81212242" Received: from 219.082.dsl.pth.iprimus.net.au (HELO [192.168.1.8]) ([58.179.220.219]) by smtp06.syd.iprimus.net.au with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2007 12:17:47 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-28--792267663 Message-Id: <914e6e28c21647778324cb7b7b6178b0@iprimus.com.au> From: david mccandless Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Giving up on single rotor Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 10:17:44 +0900 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624) --Apple-Mail-28--792267663 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 2, Dec , at 8:31 AM, Russell Duffy wrote: > > > While this=A0damper didn't work out as planned, there are still other=20= > solutions I could try, and I'm sure it's possible to make this work.=A0=A0= =20 > Unfortunately, I've already spent almost 3 years (time flies) messing=20= > with this, and there's just no escaping the fact that it's going to be=20= > too heavy to be a 912S replacement.=A0=A0Until someone manufactures a=20= > better 100 HP rotary solution (two rotor I hope), that they are=20 > actually willing=A0to sell for aircraft use, I'm afraid the 100 HP=20 > rotary isn't going to be much of an option.=A0 The 912S so desperately=20= > needs competition... > =A0 > Rusty (UAVP)=A0 ***** Hi Rusty, have you looked at the rotamax twin? Go to www.rotamax.net GL, Dave McC > =A0= --Apple-Mail-28--792267663 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 2, Dec , at 8:31 AM, Russell Duffy wrote: FFFF,0000,0000While this=A0damper didn't work out as planned, there are still other solutions I could try, and I'm sure it's possible to make this work.=A0=A0 Unfortunately, I've already spent almost 3 years (time flies) messing with this, and there's just no escaping the fact that it's going to be too heavy to be a 912S replacement.=A0=A0Until someone manufactures a better 100 HP rotary solution (two rotor I hope), that they are actually willing=A0to sell for aircraft use, I'm afraid the 100 HP rotary isn't going to be much of an option.=A0 The 912S so desperately needs competition... =A0 FFFF,0000,0000Rusty (UAVP)=A0 ***** Hi Rusty, have you looked at the rotamax twin? Go to www.rotamax.net GL, Dave McC =A0= --Apple-Mail-28--792267663--