X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <ceengland@bellsouth.net>
Received: from fmailhost01.isp.att.net ([207.115.11.51] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1)
  with ESMTP id 2501094 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:38:23 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.115.11.51; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net
Received: from [192.168.10.5] (adsl-152-71-226.jan.bellsouth.net[70.152.71.226])
          by isp.att.net (frfwmhc01) with ESMTP
          id <20071122193745H0100mln2re>; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:37:45 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [70.152.71.226]
Message-ID: <4745DA89.3030609@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:37:45 -0600
From: Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071030 SeaMonkey/1.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] additional oil cooling?
References: <list-2500945@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-2500945@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

MICHAEL SILVIUS wrote:
> Hows this for an idea? other than potential oil leak nighmare! but perhaps
> in a welded aluminum rendition?
> 
> Michael Silvius
I like it, except that the 'cooling tubes' are unlikely to be very 
efficient.

It's on my list of possibilities to replace the unusable rear-induction 
sump on the Lyc I recently bought.

Charlie