|
I calculate it at 12.65:1 A/F and 100% VE to produce around
254 HP at 6500 rpm and around 235 at 6000 rpm - perhaps a bit more. Boy!
that and weighting probably 30 lb or more less than the old iron
13B will turn the rotary into the dominant alternative engine for
aircraft. No need for a turbo or supercharger to get tremendous
performance - of course, with them you'll get even more {>)
Thanks for the displacement - as some one "graciously"
pointed out - the answer was staring me in the face {:>)
Ed
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 9:39
PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 16X Rotary
Engine.
Thanks, Lynn, what an engine! I think I'll
just keep my old 13B and just skip the Renesis {:>). Did I miss the
displacement? Do you know what it is?
Ed
1600CC. Kind of ends the talk about direct injection. Still looks like a
6 port but the primary ports (the small ones in the center iron) are much
bigger. With a combined end port as on Paul Yaws site, and maybe a mild bridge
port, I think 340 HP at 9,000 is an accurate estimate.
Maybe 250 HP at 6,500. Going to need three blades and 74 inches of
prop.
Where do I sign up?
Lynn E. Hanover
|