Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #40332
From: Al Gietzen <ALVentures@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Thick vs Thin was : Diffuser Configuration Comparison
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:26:06 -0800
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Ron;

I'm with you all the way until you get to: " Then, because heat transfer and
drag scale with
velocity squared,"

I'm aware that the heat transfer is not linear with velocity, but how does
it go as go as the square?

I have a ROT that a 16 fin/in rad with 1/2" tube spacing should be 2 3/4"
thick; and I'm sticking to it:-)  Oh; I have another ROT; the diffuser area
ratio should be in the range of 4 - 6.

Al G


Subject: [FlyRotary] Thick vs Thin was : Diffuser Configuration Comparison

Assume you have two radiators:

1) Radiator 1 is twice the frontal area of Radiator 2
2) Same wetted fin area and fin spacing, so Radiator 2
is twice as thick as Radiator 1.
3) Same air inlet with same mass flow rate
4) Different diffusers, but both have no flow
separation and perfectly uniform flow arrives at the
radiator face.
5) Both radiators have the same average skin friction
coefficient and average heat transfer coefficient in
the boundary layers that develop across the fins (this
is a small stretch and could be refined, but it is not
going to change the trends in this example).

Then, because heat transfer and drag scale with
velocity squared, and velocity is twice as high for
the thick radiator, and the thick radiator would have
four times the heat transfer, but also four times the
drag. There is always a tradeoff between heat transfer
and drag.

That is my take on the situation.

Ron

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster