X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <jwvoto@itlnet.net>
Received: from x2.itlnet.net ([64.19.112.8] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1)
  with ESMTP id 2465388 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:38:42 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.19.112.8; envelope-from=jwvoto@itlnet.net
Received: from x2.itlnet.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by x2.itlnet.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id lAAKbiQt029309
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:37:44 -0600
Received: from itlnet.net (email1.itlnet.net [192.168.10.156])
	by x2.itlnet.net (x2.itlnet.net [172.16.1.147])
	id jA9Ebi2970045739Nn ret-id none; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:37:45 -0600
Received: from JWVOTO (unverified [64.19.115.42]) 
	by itlnet.net (SurgeMail 3.8p) with ESMTP id 96246-1769559 
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:37:44 -0600
Message-ID: <007a01c823d9$a8618d60$2a731340@JWVOTO>
From: "Wendell Voto" <jwvoto@itlnet.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-2464040@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Fw: Spin Tech reply
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:37:42 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Authenticated-User: jwvoto@itlnet.net 
X-ITLnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ITLnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ITLnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
	score=-2.599, required 4, BAYES_00 -2.60, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00,
	WEIRD_PORT 0.00)


----- Anyone know which muffler has the lower restriction,  the SpinTech or
the Flowmaster? And, which is quieter?
Wendell


> Here is what SpinTech said
>
> Joe Berki
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron DiDonato" <ron@spintechmufflers.com>
> To: "Joe Berki" <jskmberki@alltel.net>
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:22 PM
> Subject: Re:
>
>
> Joe, that woulddepend on how close or far it is from your exhaust manifold
> or collector.
> 304 stainless would be around $150.00, 321 stainless would be in the
$250.00
> range.
> Same side is no problem, I'm assuming offset, offset in line.
> A larger muffler would be better
>
> Ron DiDonato
> SPINTECH Performance Mufflers
> 4768 Felspar St. Riverside, CA.92509
> 888.550.7746 / fax 951.360.2478
>
> "If it's Sounds too Good to be True,
>   it's SPINTECH!"
>
> On Thu Nov  8 17:00 , 'Joe Berki' <jskmberki@alltel.net> sent:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Will the 6000 series hold up to a Mazda 13b rotary
> >modified for P Port? How much is the stainless version? Can it be
> >made with 321 stainless? I do not think it is possible but could the
inlet
> >/outlet be on the same side? Do you recommend a different muffler for the
> >rotary? Thanks for any help
> >
> >Joe Berki
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.27/1121 - Release Date:
11/9/2007
> 7:29 PM
>
>
>
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html