Return-Path: Received: from [65.40.45.225] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.5) with HTTP id 2644977 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:03:23 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooling Model Enhancement To: flyrotary X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.5 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:03:23 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <002201c397c8$a63d6280$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Ed Anderson" : Chad, those are calculated numbers. I think I found the problem with my use of the model. and yes, the basic formular I use for heat transfer is the one you cite in your message. What I was trying to find out was if I knew the mass flow and the BTU requiring rejection into that mass flow, could I determine the expected delta T. As you say this is a complex phenomona and my simple model may just be too simple I am working on trying to factor in such things as the "thickenss" effect both on delta T and air flow, etc. Ed Anderson RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com >>>Ed, are these calculated or measured numbers? If calculated, what's the formula being used? > Here is what the temp rise model gives (all temps in farenheit): > > OAT Delta T Exit Radiator > > 0 34.9 34.9 > > 30 35.59 65.59 > > 60 36.15 96.15 > > 90 36.02 126.02 > > 120 37.48 157.48