Yeah, but it ain't traditional {:>), is too
light, too resistance to chemicals and too neat looking - can't imagine why you
use them, Tracy. I mean isn't this carrying your phobia against weight a
little too far? {:>) Hey, I could fly down and then we could go out for
BBQ - hate to see you starve.
Here is some information on them for anybody
interested
Ed
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 10:37
AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Hose clamp myth
busters
Am I the only fan of Gates 'Power Grip' hose clamps? They are heat
shrinkable sleeves made for this application.
They have everything I like in a hose clamp except one (they are
not reusable) (OK, maybe two, every hose size needs a different clamp part
number and size)
They are the lightest, have constant grip force, most evenly
distributed clamping force of all types, widest grip area, low in cost (if
constant hose removal not required) and can be used in tight places
where there is no way to get a tool on them to tighten (I have a few of
those). They NEVER loosen and require no checking or safety
wiring. I know of no failures of these clamps. These
properties make them the clamp of choice for me.
Only place I don't use them is on oil lines but of course I use no
clamps at all there (Aeroquip push on connectors and hose)
On an airplane, I have as much use for those heavy spring loaded constant
force hose clamps as I do a bumper jack. If I was a semi
truck driver, they are the only thing I'd use.
Tracy (starving - Laura on 8 day trip to Hawaii)
On 10/7/07, Thomas
Jakits <rotary.thjakits@gmail.com>
wrote:
2nd Al's motion,
I fly helicopters for a living (the certificated versions ....)
The last one has some of the hydraulics system (low pressure to/from
the cooler) and the turbine oil to cooler hoses clamped with 2 regular
clamps on each end. Though the hoses are capped off with a metalcap that has
to prongs that go under the clamps, just to hold the cap on the hose end.
Constant pressure is good, but good regular clamps will do fine. You
can safety wire them too, allthough the ones on the helo are not.
Then, I have to do a daily pre-flight inspection that includes to grap
and pull the hoses somewhat. Short work of makeing sure the clamps are not
loose, too.
If you do not or cannot preflight the engine like that before every
flight, safetywire will give you some peace of mind..
Wiggins is the "smoothest" custom touch though! Max points for coolness
too.
Sometimes cool is nice, even if you need "people in the know" to
appreciate details like "Wiggins"
Cheers,
TJ
On 10/7/07, Mark
Steitle <msteitle@gmail.com >
wrote:
Al,
Thanks for the analysis. I always wondered why cars, which use
the "old fashion" clamps, don't blow hoses left and right. I guess
I'm just a belt and suspenders kind of guy. I like the fact that
they adjust to the expansion.
Mark S.
(I used "Wiggins" couplings)
On 10/6/07, Al
Gietzen <ALVentures@cox.net>
wrote:
If those hose clamps are not constant torque
clamps, please consider upgrading them before first flight.
They're available from McMaster.
Mark;
I have no
objection to the use constant torque clamps, of course. But I will
express my conclusion/opinion that this clamp thing has been over sold.
Certainly not picking on you, and I know our friend on the other
list makes a big issue of the constant torque clamp. IIRC, the
main point raised was the effect of thermal expansion, more exactly the
differential thermal expansion between the inner metal tube (aluminum in
this case) and the clamp (usually SS). Doing the math will show
that this is less than infinitesimal. The temp change of the
coolant may be about 80 C cold to hot. The clamp heats up maybe
15C less than the aluminum. Assume a 1 ½" diameter. So the
aluminum expands about 0.000037" on the diameter while the SS expands
only 0.000012"; a huge difference of 0.000025". I am certain that
this effect on the thickness of the elastomer hose is entirely
negligible. And besides, having that clamp just a wee smidgeon tighter
when it is hot and pressurized can't be a bad thing.
Now, it is
true that over time the elastomer loses some of its elasticity, mostly
over the first few months, and then very slowly over the next few years
– depending on the type of elastomer, of course.
So whether
they are regular good quality clamps, properly tightened (not
over-tightened), or constant torque clamps properly tightened; I'd
suggest that the important factors are: re-torque the clamps after a few
weeks or a month of use; use the widest clamp for the diameter, and
consider high quality silicone hose – although contemporary automotive
coolant hose can be expected to last 6 – 9 years. The other thing,
of course, is that on our planes we will probably change out the hoses
every second annual or so anyway.
One more
thing. Consider putting a Schroeder valve on the system somewhere
so you can easily pressure test the system before you fly (or before you
start your engine), and maybe at annual time. It is so much easier
to deal with any leak while things are cool and on the ground.
Sorry; did I
go on too long
J?
Al
G
|