X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 2375634 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:15:01 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.67; envelope-from=CBarber@TexasAttorney.net Received: from [64.91.181.4] (helo=userte4ok6qti7) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1IewBR-0005Wx-3H for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:14:22 -0400 From: "Christopher Barber" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Hose clamp myth busters Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:13:41 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1552_01C809A4.AA2001D0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-ELNK-Trace: 04a7e290e6af3b12d3631fa4f7b525ef239a348a220c260939b5a53137c3174a0a39fe33547733dd93caf27dac41a8fd350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 64.91.181.4 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_1552_01C809A4.AA2001D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Good thread. Thanks for the insight and passed on experience and knowledge. Great data to put in my mobile bio database I keep stored in my skull. Off to the gym and then the hangar to start wrapping my radiator for cooling ducting. Wahoooo. All the best, Chris -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Kelly Troyer Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 9:07 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Hose clamp myth busters Guess you could classify spring type clamps as "Poor Mans Constant Torque Clamps" -- Kelly Troyer "Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine "RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2 "Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold -------------- Original message from Bulent Aliev : -------------- > Dale, I used them a lot on low pressure fuel hoses and small diameter > cooling hoses. Never failed and I liked them better than the screw > type clamps. > Buly > > > On Oct 7, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Dale Rogers wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Maybe this is one of those things that isn't terribly obvious, > > but - > > having used a variety of screw type clamps - I'm wondering why > > plain old spring clamps aren't suitable for this application. I can't > > ever remember having one fail in service. (photos below) > > > > Dale R. > > COZY MkIV #0497 > > Ch.12; Ch's 13, 16, 19 & 23 in-progress ------=_NextPart_000_1552_01C809A4.AA2001D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Good=20 thread.  Thanks for the insight and passed on experience and=20 knowledge.  Great data to put in my mobile bio database I keep = stored in my=20 skull.
 
Off to=20 the gym and then the hangar to start wrapping my radiator for cooling=20 ducting.  Wahoooo.
 
All=20 the best,
 
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20 [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Kelly=20 Troyer
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 9:07 AM
To: = Rotary=20 motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Hose clamp myth=20 busters

Guess you could classify spring type clamps as "Poor Mans = Constant Torque=20 Clamps"
--
Kelly Troyer
"Dyke = Delta"_13B=20 ROTARY Engine
"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
"Mistral"_Backplate/Oil = Manifold=20




--------------=20 Original message from Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net>:=20 --------------


> Dale, I used them a lot on low = pressure fuel=20 hoses and small diameter
> cooling hoses. Never failed and I = liked=20 them better than the screw
> type clamps.
> Buly =
>=20
>
> On Oct 7, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Dale Rogers wrote: =
>=20
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Maybe this is one = of those=20 things that isn't terribly obvious,
> > but -
> = > having=20 used a variety of screw type clamps - I'm wondering why
> = > plain=20 old spring clamps aren't suitable for this application. I can't =
>=20 > ever remember having one fail in service. (photos below) =
> >=20
> > Dale R.
> > COZY MkIV #0497
> > = Ch.12;=20 Ch's 13, 16, 19 & 23 in-progress =
------=_NextPart_000_1552_01C809A4.AA2001D0--