X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.115] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 2375305 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:07:38 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.131.115; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from mwebmail14.att.net ([204.127.135.40]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP id <2007100814065911100pvlj6e>; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:06:59 +0000 Received: from [4.245.54.22] by mwebmail14.att.net; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:06:58 +0000 From: keltro@att.net (Kelly Troyer) To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Hose clamp myth busters Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:06:58 +0000 Message-Id: <100820071406.6726.470A39820004863500001A462160280748019D9B040A05@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Mar 24 2007) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_6726_1191852418_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_6726_1191852418_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Guess you could classify spring type clamps as "Poor Mans Constant Torque Clamps" -- Kelly Troyer "Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine "RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2 "Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold -------------- Original message from Bulent Aliev : -------------- > Dale, I used them a lot on low pressure fuel hoses and small diameter > cooling hoses. Never failed and I liked them better than the screw > type clamps. > Buly > > > On Oct 7, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Dale Rogers wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Maybe this is one of those things that isn't terribly obvious, > > but - > > having used a variety of screw type clamps - I'm wondering why > > plain old spring clamps aren't suitable for this application. I can't > > ever remember having one fail in service. (photos below) > > > > Dale R. > > COZY MkIV #0497 > > Ch.12; Ch's 13, 16, 19 & 23 in-progress --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_6726_1191852418_0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Guess you could classify spring type clamps as "Poor Mans Constant Torque Clamps"
--
Kelly Troyer
"Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine
"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
"Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold




-------------- Original message from Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net>: --------------


> Dale, I used them a lot on low pressure fuel hoses and small diameter
> cooling hoses. Never failed and I liked them better than the screw
> type clamps.
> Buly
>
>
> On Oct 7, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Dale Rogers wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Maybe this is one of those things that isn't terribly obvious,
> > but -
> > having used a variety of screw type clamps - I'm wondering why
> > plain old spring clamps aren't suitable for this application. I can't
> > ever remember having one fail in service. (photos below)
> >
> > Dale R.
> > COZY MkIV #0497
> > Ch.12; Ch's 13, 16, 19 & 23 in-progress
--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_6726_1191852418_0--