X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost01.isp.att.net ([204.127.217.101] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 2374542 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:12:59 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.101; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from [70.149.0.164] (adsl-149-0-164.mia.bellsouth.net[70.149.0.164]) by bellsouth.net (frfwmhc01) with SMTP id <20071008031222H0100ab2g5e>; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 03:12:22 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [70.149.0.164] Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bulent Aliev Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Hose clamp myth busters Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 23:12:19 -0400 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Dale, I used them a lot on low pressure fuel hoses and small diameter cooling hoses. Never failed and I liked them better than the screw type clamps. Buly On Oct 7, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Dale Rogers wrote: > Hi All, > > Maybe this is one of those things that isn't terribly obvious, > but - > having used a variety of screw type clamps - I'm wondering why > plain old spring clamps aren't suitable for this application. I can't > ever remember having one fail in service. (photos below) > > Dale R. > COZY MkIV #0497 > Ch.12; Ch's 13, 16, 19 & 23 in-progress > > > > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/ > flyrotary/List.html