Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #39625
From: <Lehanover@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Another cooling question
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:18:09 EDT
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In a message dated 9/30/2007 10:32:24 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes:
 Mark, if you really had excess air flowing through your radiators the coolant would drop more than 4 Deg F.  In fact, the more air flow the more coolant Delta T you would drop through the radiator. 
<snip>
 
That's exactly what I HAD thought, until I was told that the air could pass through too fast and not pick up as much heat.  This didn't make sense to me.  Maybe I wasn't listening closely and missed the point altogether (wouldn't be the first time). 
 
 
This is one of the oldest myths around - that air or coolant will flow too fast to pick up the heat.  It just IS NOT factual.  The more mass flow you have, the more heat you will carry away.  It appears that some early experimenters noted that if you slowed the flow of coolant through a radiator that there was a greater temperature drop of the fluid than if it flowed through faster.  better myth.  I once had an debate
Ed, Could you comment on this?:
 
On race cars I modify the radiators to be double or triple pass. By inserting baffles in the tanks, to force the coolant through a fewer number of tubes, and therefore at a higher velocity. The effect is that the radiator has 1/3 or 1/2 the tube count but the tubes are twice or three times as long and have exactly the same area exposed the airflow. It has never failed to work for me.
 
My thinking is that the flow rate remains very energetic and is scrubbing the inside of the tubes with gusto, dumping more heat than a slower flowing coolant.
 
What do you think?




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster