X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [64.12.136.170] (HELO imo-m11.mail.aol.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 2336803 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:35:42 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.136.170; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m11.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.d2f.11563f89 (42808) for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:35:00 -0400 (EDT) From: WRJJRS@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:35:00 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] One for the guys that don't give up To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1190086500" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5042 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1190086500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 In a message dated 9/17/2007 5:23:02 PM Pacific Standard Time, =20 ALVentures@cox.net writes: I have all the latest updates on the EC2, and I have double checked the=20 static timing set at 35o BTDC. From that point on the EC2 is handling the=20= timing=20 curve with rpm and MAP. Al, was 35=B0 BTDC Tracys suggested timing? That sounds like too much lead t= o =20 me. I thought the base timing was closer to 25=B0 than 35=B0. Not certain, b= ut=20 that is the way I remember it. I think Lynn metioned running 28=B0 total. J= ust the=20 way I remember it I certainly could be wrong. Bill Jepson ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com -------------------------------1190086500 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 9/17/2007 5:23:02 PM Pacific Standard Time,=20 ALVentures@cox.net writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DVerdana color=3D#0000ff siz= e=3D2>

I have all th= e=20 latest updates on the EC2, and I have double checked the static timing set= at=20 35o BTDC.  From that point on the EC2 is handling the timi= ng=20 curve with rpm and MAP.

Al, was 35=B0 BTDC Tracys suggested timing? That sounds like too much l= ead to=20 me. I thought the base timing was closer to 25=B0 than 35=B0. Not certain, b= ut that=20 is the way I remember it. I think Lynn metioned running 28=B0 total. Just th= e way=20 I remember it I certainly could be wrong.
Bill Jepson



See what'= s new at AOL.co= m and Make AOL Your Homepage.
-------------------------------1190086500--