Return-Path: Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2642193 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 01:21:14 -0400 Received: (qmail 3692 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2003 05:21:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frontiernet.net) ([170.215.97.8]) (envelope-sender ) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.6) with SMTP for ; 19 Oct 2003 05:21:13 -0000 Message-ID: <3F921F75.BD7D617B@frontiernet.net> Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 00:21:58 -0500 From: Jim Sower X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] RotaryEng List was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Seriesvs PARALLEL pumps & flowmeter References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C248CD62D1B89262A8B9A5A8" --------------C248CD62D1B89262A8B9A5A8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <... Paul Lamar appears to have access to the FlyRotary List. I just got a couple of blistering e mails from him. In that somebody provided him a copy of an e mail exchange from this list. ...> Isn't it one of the hallmarks of dysfunction when someone hears a message that makes him uncomfortable he ignores the message and attacks the messenger ...? Or is that a hallmark of something else? .... Someone help me pin this one down ... Jim S. Ed Anderson wrote: > Just thought I would let folks know - should it matter or > not. Paul Lamar appears to have access to the FlyRotary List. > I just got a couple of blistering e mails from him. In that > somebody provided him a copy of an e mail exchange from this > list. He was provided access to at least one message (and > perhaps more) and apparently felt he was the "expert" I > referred to and apparently took exception to it, or rather my > "debulking of the myth" regarding power requirements. He > appears to feel that he is one of the "experts" ( or more to > the point THE expert) I was referring to who provided early > estimates on the power required to flow adequate coolant. > While Paul did perform such calculations, he was not the only > one by any means, I provided a few myself {:>). So I have > responded rather restrained and appropriately and suggested > that if he found me a bother on his list (or was it this list > {:>)), that he could remove me from the rotaryeng list at his > convience. In any case, no big deal - but it does appear that > whether the e mail was sent in all "innoince" to Paul and > that part just happened to be part of the thread or whether > malice intend was the motivator is unimportant to me. But > just thought the rest of you should be aware. Now you guys > are likely to be stuck with me totally {:>). --------------C248CD62D1B89262A8B9A5A8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <... Paul Lamar appears to have access to the FlyRotary List.  I just got a couple of blistering e mails from him.  In that somebody provided him a copy of an e mail exchange from this list.   ...>
Isn't it one of the hallmarks of dysfunction when someone hears a message that makes him uncomfortable he ignores the message and attacks the messenger ....?
Or is that a hallmark of something else? .... Someone help me pin this one down ... Jim S.
 

Ed Anderson wrote:

Just thought I would let folks know - should it matter or not. Paul Lamar appears to have access to the FlyRotary List.  I just got a couple of blistering e mails from him.  In that somebody provided him a copy of an e mail exchange from this list. He was provided access to at least one message (and perhaps more) and apparently felt he was the "expert" I referred to and apparently took exception to it,  or rather my "debulking of the myth" regarding power requirements.  He appears to feel that he is one of the "experts" ( or more to the point THE expert) I was referring to who provided early estimates on the power required to flow adequate coolant.  While Paul did perform such calculations, he was not the only one by any means, I provided a few myself {:>). So I have responded rather restrained and appropriately and suggested that if he found me a bother on his list (or was it this list {:>)), that he could remove me from the rotaryeng list at his convience. In any case, no big deal - but it does appear that whether the e mail was sent in all "innoince" to Paul and  that part just happened to be part of the thread or whether malice intend was the motivator is unimportant to me.  But just thought the rest of you should be aware.  Now you guys are likely to be stuck with me totally {:>).
--------------C248CD62D1B89262A8B9A5A8--