Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #38819
From: M Roberts <montyr2157@alltel.net>
Subject: Best Renesis Auto intake length
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:07:08 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
As with most things, there is no one best length.  Answer depends on max RPM, what you want to optimize, how much room you have, what prop is used (fixed or variable), how much money you want to spend, etc.
 
With a fixed pitch prop I liked my first system the best for a good combination of climb rate & speed.  Climb was at 6200 rpm.  It had 16 - 17" runner length and did use a Dynamic Chamber.  Please don't make me or Ed rehash the DC again : )
 
My current manifold only has about 10.5" runners and gives up a little on climb rate but really starts to pull strongly above 7000 rpm.   "Cleanliness" is of course very important.
 
Tracy
 
Tracy,
 
I promise not to make you and Ed rehash the dynamic chamber. ;-)
 
I tried searching the archives for every combination of runner, length, intake, tuning I could think of and the results were not exactly what I was looking for. Now I'll search for dynamic chamber and see what shows up.
 
I was looking at my Renesis and thinking how nice it was that it was all put together and there was nothing wrong with it. In a moment of weakness I considered leaving it that way. Then after sleeping on it I decided it had to come apart to fix the oil jets and de-carbon everything.....so I'll just stick with plan A.
 
The problem with my installation is the cowl is very tight and I only have room for two options for intake length.
 
1.) Very short 9" with the carbs right against the ports.
 
2.) Very long 20"+ with the carbs on the other side of the engine.
 
After reading about Ed's experience with the short intakes I started to think maybe I should go with the longer solution, in addition it should be better in cruise.
 
The P-port should give enough power on the top end that an intake optimized for mid range shouldn't hurt too bad.
 
Of course a CS prop would solve most problems including any surplus cash problem ;-).
 
 The short system would probably have a higher BSFC.
 
As always....testing is the answer.
 
Monty
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster