|
Marc Wiese wrote:
All,
http://www.geareddrives.com/Buds_philosophy.htm Has a nice write up in the last Contact mag. I like the features of his
psru----cs, separate lube, offset shaft. He says "Build the PSRU so that anyone would be feel good about taking their
grandchildren on a cross country flight. Safety being our first
consideration, we do not advocate the use of belts, chains or planetary
gears in something as important as a propeller drive. Belts break, chains
stretch, and planetary gears are simply not designed to operate at high
RPM's and under such a great load as they are under while in use in an
airplane. Planetary gears do well in situations that only require high RPM
for a very brief period of time, but are not designed to operate under
consistent and continuous use at high RPMs. This is a recipe for disaster in
our opinion. Spur gears, as we use in our PSRU, on the other hand, are
designed to safely operate at a high RPMs and under continuously use. We
chose to use what we know to be the most dependable and reliable technology
for this application because our objective was to do what makes sense in
terms of safety, reliability, and ease of maintenance. "
Erstwhile comments on the planetary? What do you think Mistral makes of
this? Of course his redrives are mostly made for V8's but I really like the
clutch feature as he implements it!
Marc Wiese
Something else he said was that the clutch was to compensate for burning up starters 'turning the gears & prop'. I'm no engineer, but if adding the load of the gearbox to the load of turning a 10/1 compression 400" V-8 burns up the starter, I'd take a long hard look at the gearbox. Looks like a lot of extra weight and complexity to compensate for something no one else seems to have trouble with.
(But being able to use an off the shelf c/s prop would be nice.)
Charlie
|
|