X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc1-s24.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.96] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2182870 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:29:26 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.96; envelope-from=lors01@msn.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.250.31]) by bay0-omc1-s24.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:28:48 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:28:47 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.250.200 by by115fd.bay115.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:28:44 GMT X-Originating-IP: [75.104.126.119] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] X-Sender: lors01@msn.com In-Reply-To: From: "Tracy crook" To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Bcc: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 changes Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:28:44 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jul 2007 15:28:47.0774 (UTC) FILETIME=[2B683BE0:01C7C887] Return-Path: lors01@msn.com >From: "Al Gietzen" > > >I'm puzzling over fuel flow calibration. I had it pretty close (when on >controller A; on B it is way off, and I'm thinking it can't work on B); but >then we did the injector snubber update, and it was reading way too high. >So >I followed the manual and increased FFCAL; and it then read nonsensically >high. So I set it too a number lower than I started with; and it is still >reading higher than it did to start. I must be doing something wrong. > > Recently found that it is possible to set the FFCAL value to more than 255 but 255 is the highest valid setting (it is a 1 byte value). If 255 is not high enough, you need to set the Fuel Flow Coarse adjust value higher (#18). If you have not had the EM2 updated since the snubber change, you will not have this coarse adjust value in the EM2. That is why the EM2 and EC2 must be updated at the same time. Tracy