Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.70; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net
Message-ID: <46999FB4.3010502@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:16:52 -0500
From: Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070222 SeaMonkey/1.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] FW: Elected Officials at Work
References: <list-2177910@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-2177910@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Trent is my senator. I spent about 15 minutes talking to one of his 
assistants a few weeks ago about this issue; it's obvious where the 
money is coming from. He's really been marching in lock-step for the 
last few years.

He's already committed political suicide here with his support of the 
illegal immigrant amnesty bill. I'm just hoping that the collateral 
damage will get his heir-apparent, as well, when Trent retires after 
this term.

Y'all call & talk to your employees. (They are your employees, not your 
leaders; don't forget it.) The reason most vote with the money is 
because they never hear from the voters. No votes, no office, no money.

Charlie

Kelly Troyer wrote:
>  
> Off subject but of interest to all!!
> 
>     07.14.07 Edition: Sens. Rockefeller, Lott Say GA Will Pay If S.1300
>     Fails "There
>     Are Ways To Do That, And We Will Find Those Ways"
> 
>     Two US Senators openly
>     threatened the general aviation community Thursday, stating if
>     GA pilots refuse to accept a blanket user fee for filing an IFR
>     flight plan... there will be consequences.
> 
>     "Commercial airline passengers shouldn't continue to subsidize
>     corporate jets," said aviation subcommittee Chairman John D.
>     Rockefeller (right)during Thursday's Senate Finance Committee
>     hearing. "If we don't restore equity, then as chairman of this
>     aviation subcommittee, I will address the equity issue by looking
>     for ways to limit general aviation access to congested
>     airspace."
> 
>     "There are ways to do that, and we will find those ways," the
>     West Virginia democrat added ominously.
> 
>     Mississppi Senator Trent Lott joined his colleague across the
>     aisle in threatening general aviation, if the Senate's FAA funding
>     bill (S.1300) is changed or disapproved.
> 
>     "We're going to have a fair bill or no bill, and I'm prepared to
>     go to the mat," the Republican said.
> 
>     As ANN reported, the two
>     senators introduced the Senate's proposed funding plan for FAA
>     reauthorization in May. The plan would phase out a 4.3 cent per
>     gallon tax airlines pay for fuel, and introduces a new per-trip fee
>     for piston and turbine general aviation pilots who fly under IFR
>     flight plans.
> 
>     Rockefeller and Lott say their plan restores 'fairness' to
>     funding the FAA. But that can be in the eyes of the beholder, notes
>     the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association -- and several other
>     senators maintain airlines already receive sizable breaks.
> 
>     "We've had preferential tax treatment for the airlines,
>     particularly in pensions," notes Kansas Senator Pat Roberts.
> 
>     And, Roberts notes, there are also more equitable ways to insure
>     all users of the nation's air traffic control system pay their fair
>     share. "The general aviation community is not unreceptive to an
>     increase in the gas tax," said Roberts. "They're for modernization
>     as well."
> 
>     Rockefeller sneers at those opposed to the $25 IFR fee, saying
>     it "isn't exactly a backbreaker," and that "90 percent of general
>     aviation aircraft are excluded" from paying.
> 
>     "It's not the fee, it is the structure," Senator Roberts
>     replies. "All of general aviation is opposed to the fee, even the
>     90 percent that are exempt."
> 
>     Plus, Roberts adds, "I don't
>     think that giving the airlines a tax break is the best way to start
>     modernization."
> 
>     Eliminating the fuel tax for airlines also struck New Mexico
>     Senator Jeff Bingaman a bit oddly. Given all the FAA is hoping to
>     accomplish with its proposed Next Generation Air Traffic Control
>     System, "why would you eliminate the fuel tax on the airlines?" he
>     asked.
> 
>     Bingaman also pointed out the ATC user fee would likely
>     discourage flights to smaller communities. Witness Gerald
>     Dillingham of the Government Accountability Office agreed, noting
>     that regional air carrier profits are so slim that "the $25 fee
>     could put them over the edge."
> 
>     Dillingham restated his contention from previous hearings,
>     saying that the current excise tax-based funding system "could
>     support all FAA activities, including NextGen." He added forecasted
>     revenues to the aviation trust fund could support increased FAA
>     spending.
> 
>     Peter R. Orszag, director of the Congressional Budget Office,
>     said that with a forecast 7 percent annual growth in aviation tax
>     revenues, the trust fund would bring in some $158 billion over the
>     next 10 years, versus an inflation-adjusted FAA budget baseline of
>     $135 billion.
> 
>     Even FAA Administrator Marion Blakey -- one of the most vocal
>     advocates for user fees, alongside Air Tra nsport Association
>     president James May -- came close to admitting the FAA takes in
>     enough money already, reports the Aircraft Owners and Pilots
>     Association.
> 
>     "We [the FAA] don't feel starved for funds," Blakey responded,
>     to a question posed by New York Senator Charles Schumer during
>     Thursday's hearing.
> 
>     "I can't begin to tell you
>     how strongly Sen. Rockefeller feels about the $25 ATC modernization
>     surcharge or user fee," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "And we
>     have tried to explain to him how dead set we are against any user
>     fee on any segment of aviation, regardless of the amount.
> 
>     "But general aviation is willing to contribute more toward
>     system modernization through the fuel. That's why we have endorsed
>     H.R.2881, the House FAA funding bill. We would ask the Senate to
>     give fair consideration to the taxing and funding concepts in that
>     bill."
> 
>     The funding authority for the FAA and the government's abili t y
>     to collect aviation taxes will expire at the end of September. If
>     an FAA funding bill (called a "reauthorization bill") is not
>     approved before then, the FAA could be forced to stop
>     operations.
>     FMI: www.senate.gov <http://www.senate.gov/>, www.aopa.org
>     <http://www.aopa.org/>, www.faa.gov <http://www.faa.gov/>
>