X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2038972 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 11 May 2007 21:57:01 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.73; envelope-from=rusty@radrotary.com Received: from ibm69aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070512015624.PSFG22339.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm69aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 21:56:24 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm69aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070512015623.MKQG26566.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 21:56:23 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" To: "Flyrotary List" Subject: Operating limitations question- not rotary related Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:56:24 -0500 Message-ID: <008201c79438$bef19010$6e01a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0083_01C7940E.D61B8810" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6822 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Importance: Normal Thread-Index: AceUOLyp2WSJ4Z/9Sk6TtUaTXXcwMw== This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C7940E.D61B8810 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings, =20 Sorry for the off topic question, but I'm trying to figure out if my DAR = is screwing up the operating limitations that he's been issuing. =20 =20 If you received an airworthiness certificate in the last year or so, = would you look and see if you have one, or both of these items: =20 (17) The pilot in command of this aircraft must hold an appropriate category/class rating. If required, the pilot in command also must hold = a type rating in accordance with part 61, or a letter of authorization = issued by an FAA Flight Standards Operations Inspector. (18) The pilot in command of this aircraft must hold a pilot certificate = or an authorized instructor=92s logbook endorsement. The pilot in command = also must meet the requirements of =A7 61.31(e), (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j), = as appropriate. =20 My DAR has been including both, but from what another DAR said, the = first applies to turbojet and turbofan aircraft over 12,500 lbs, and item 18 applies to most exp aircraft. If that's true, you should only have one = or the other. Item 17 is what's causing me to get a SP category/class = rating for my gyroplane, but now I find out that it isn't supposed to be there. = =20 =20 Please just reply to me directly, rather than cluttering up the list = with replies. =20 Thanks, Rusty (getting back to the single rotor soon) Rusty (at) radrotary.com =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C7940E.D61B8810 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Greetings,
 
Sorry for the = off topic=20 question, but I'm trying to figure out if my DAR is screwing up the = operating=20 limitations that he's been issuing. 
 
If you received = an=20 airworthiness certificate in the last year or so, would you look and see = if you=20 have one, or both of these items:
 
(17) The pilot = in command=20 of this aircraft must hold an appropriate category/class rating. If = required,=20 the pilot in command also must hold a type rating in accordance with = part 61, or=20 a letter of authorization issued by an FAA Flight Standards Operations=20 Inspector.
(18) The pilot = in command=20 of this aircraft must hold a pilot certificate or an authorized = instructor’s=20 logbook endorsement. The pilot in command also must meet the = requirements of =A7=20 61.31(e), (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j), as = appropriate.
 
My DAR has been = including=20 both, but from what another DAR said, the first applies to turbojet and = turbofan=20 aircraft over 12,500 lbs, and item 18 applies to most exp=20 aircraft.  If that's true, you should only  have one or = the=20 other.  Item 17 is what's causing me to get a SP = category/class rating=20 for my gyroplane, but now I find out that it isn't supposed to = be=20 there.  
 
Please just reply to=20 me directly, rather than cluttering up the list=20 with replies.
 
Thanks,
Rusty (getting back to=20 the single rotor soon)
Rusty (at) = radrotary.com
   
 
------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C7940E.D61B8810--