<... we have the evidence flying so what more can I say.  Even
if its not 0.135 HP its clear that real world data regarding EWP
on the flying rotary has clearly shown it is entirely
feasible...>
You couldn't be more right.  When the smoke clears and the dust
settles, we're going to be a DAMN SITE closer to 0.135 hp than
13.5.  All accumulated data will demonstrate that PL is off by a
couple orders of magnitude.
No surprises there .... Jim S.


> Marvin Kaye wrote:
>
>>   I mean
>> we have the evidence flying so what more can I say.  Even if
>> its not 0.135 HP
>> its clear that real world data regarding EWP on the flying
>> rotary has clearly
>> shown it is entirely feasible and does not need to draw
>> several hundred amps
>> as Paul's calculations indicated.  Your figures are no
>> better than the
>> accuracy of your assumptions (trust me - I know {:>)
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Ed Anderson
>> RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
>> Matthews, NC
>> eanderson@carolina.rr.com
>>
>> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> >>  Archive:
>> http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>