Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #36772
From: Thomas Jakits <rotary.thjakits@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Throttle body size/ other "Paul" issues
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 23:10:01 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
You are right, the text I quoted mentions boundary-layer thickness as an important factor.
Though before I would glue VG's (howitzer) on the plane I'd try turbolator tape or sanding with 350 or 400 lengthwise in front of the inlet . Anything to energize the flow and thin out the b-layer.
 
This may be another easy test for Ed - reversible too!
Ed, try turbolator tape inside your ducts starting at some point and moving 1/4" wise around from it.
If you hit the right spot, separation should be delayed, flow more efficient, cooler tems.
Then you close the cowl-flaps and run faster!
Another one would be to sand the inner surfaces lengthwise towards the radiator - should "streamline" and energize the boundary-flow - sometimes "as smooth as possible" is NOT the best way :)
 
TJ

 
On 5/2/07, marv@lancair.net <marv@lancair.net> wrote:
I remember visiting a Velocity project a number of years ago that had a well-constructed NACA duct in an improper location and it simply didn't do the job.  Rather than close it off and relocate it the builder installed a row of vortex generators in front of the duct about as far away as the duct was wide and it then worked like a charm.  Perhaps not the most elegant solution but another case for more than one way to skin the proverbial cat.  FWIW.

   <Marv>


 "Thomas Jakits" <rotary.thjakits@gmail.com > wrote:

"""
just recently read about the Naca:

It can work VERY WELL, *IF*
a) You have the right location
...snip...
"""

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster