X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:  30 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [67.8.181.30] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.8)
  with HTTP id 2022736 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 May 2007 23:45:23 -0400
From: marv@lancair.net
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Throttle body size/ other "Paul" issues
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.8
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 23:45:23 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2022736@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-2022697@logan.com>
References: <list-2022697@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<div id="_htmlarea_default_style_" style="font:10pt arial,helvetica,sans-serif">I remember visiting a Velocity project a number of years ago that had a well-constructed NACA duct in an improper location and it simply didn't do the job.&nbsp; Rather than close it off and relocate it the builder installed a row of vortex generators in front of the duct about as far away as the duct was wide and it then worked like a charm.&nbsp; Perhaps not the most elegant solution but another case for more than one way to skin the proverbial cat.&nbsp; FWIW.<br><br>&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;Marv&gt;<br><br><br>&nbsp;"Thomas Jakits" &lt;rotary.thjakits@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br><br>"""<br>just recently read about the Naca:<br> <br> It can work VERY WELL, *IF*<br> a) You have the right
location<br>...snip...<br>"""<br><br></div>