<... Your figures are no better than the accuracy of your assumptions ....>
As articulated in one of my favorite nuggets: "... a flawless line of reasoning, based on a false premise leads us right through the lookin' glass ...".
A notion completely lost on PL ... Jim S.

Marvin Kaye wrote:

  I mean
we have the evidence flying so what more can I say.  Even if its not 0.135 HP
its clear that real world data regarding EWP on the flying rotary has clearly
shown it is entirely feasible and does not need to draw several hundred amps
as Paul's calculations indicated.  Your figures are no better than the
accuracy of your assumptions (trust me - I know {:>)

Best Regards

Ed Anderson
RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
eanderson@carolina.rr.com

>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html