Return-Path: Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2629973 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:40:24 -0400 Received: (qmail 9446 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 13:40:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frontiernet.net) ([170.215.97.8]) (envelope-sender ) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.6) with SMTP for ; 9 Oct 2003 13:40:23 -0000 Message-ID: <3F85575D.17A0472A@frontiernet.net> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 08:41:01 -0400 From: Jim Sower X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP - Success at last? References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8F6D236F84B8385A295762A3" --------------8F6D236F84B8385A295762A3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <... Your figures are no better than the accuracy of your assumptions ...> As articulated in one of my favorite nuggets: "... a flawless line of reasoning, based on a false premise leads us right through the lookin' glass ...". A notion completely lost on PL ... Jim S. Marvin Kaye wrote: > I mean > we have the evidence flying so what more can I say. Even if its not 0.135 HP > its clear that real world data regarding EWP on the flying rotary has clearly > shown it is entirely feasible and does not need to draw several hundred amps > as Paul's calculations indicated. Your figures are no better than the > accuracy of your assumptions (trust me - I know {:>) > > Best Regards > > Ed Anderson > RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered > Matthews, NC > eanderson@carolina.rr.com > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html --------------8F6D236F84B8385A295762A3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <... Your figures are no better than the accuracy of your assumptions ....>
As articulated in one of my favorite nuggets: "... a flawless line of reasoning, based on a false premise leads us right through the lookin' glass ...".
A notion completely lost on PL ... Jim S.

Marvin Kaye wrote:

I mean
we have the evidence flying so what more can I say. Even if its not 0.135 HP
its clear that real world data regarding EWP on the flying rotary has clearly
shown it is entirely feasible and does not need to draw several hundred amps
as Paul's calculations indicated. Your figures are no better than the
accuracy of your assumptions (trust me - I know {:>)
Best Regards
Ed Anderson
RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
eanderson@carolina.rr.com
>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html

--------------8F6D236F84B8385A295762A3--