Almost always some kind of a monocoque built up structure. Also some forms of aluminum have a yield strength near that of steel. More likely the structure accomodates the materials shortcomings.
Russell Duffy wrote:
> Greetings,
> > As I ponder my choices for mounting the single rotor engine, I noticed > something that surprised me. 304 stainless is cheaper than 4130 steel. > One thing that's always bothered me about steel tube type construction > is the concern for rusting inside the tubes, so stainless is appealing. > There must be a catch here. > > Is there a good reason I should use 4130 instead of 304? Either will > likely be sized much larger than needed, since I don't have the means to > do any proper analysis of the strength. > > Thanks,
> Rusty (Autoflight drive supposed to be shipping next week)
> Well, after wading through all the replies, everyone seems to be ignoring the obvious answer: aluminum. :-)
Sounds heretical, but there are AL mounts that have been flying for decades on certified a/c. IIRC, some of the bed mounts for Franklins are AL.
Charlie
--
Homepage:
http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/