Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #35819
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Fw: [FlyRotary] Separation
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:17:48 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
 
Thomas, This slide show the findings that I consider most significant (for my duct-design-dilemma (D^3))..  Skin friction and separation both cause pressure loss and drag increase - however, separation is by far the bigger cooling killer than skin drag.  Also note - that increasing the air velocity to delay separation will contribute to more skin drag - but, I decided I did not care - because separation was the bigger bad guy.  I would make the skin as smooth as I could and that would have to take care of minimizing skin friction.
 
So with that and old Mr. Bernoulli findings I decided a pinch duct would:
 
1.  Reduce the opening area more effectively than what I would have to do with a truncated Streamline duct- thereby reducing cooling drag.
2. Would increase the energy of the boundary layer thereby permitting it to penetrate further into the expansion area before separation occured.
3. Would fit my installation - a not insignificant consideration in the decision.
oh, and most importantly:
4.  Looked sexy, would raise a lot of questions and make it look like I understood this stuff {:>)
 
Once again credit goes to Mr's K&W, Horner and a few others.
 
Ed

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster