X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 11 [X] Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTP id 1874251 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:51:25 -0500 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.71.176.117; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Feb 2007 09:50:20 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,231,1170662400"; d="scan'208"; a="116850736:sNHT43011315" Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1SHoKs1005539 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:50:20 -0500 Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l1SHoGOA016795 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:50:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:50:16 -0500 Received: from [64.102.38.200] ([64.102.38.200]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:50:15 -0500 Message-ID: <45E5C0D7.3050304@nc.rr.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:50:15 -0500 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: engine mount 4130 vs 304 SS References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2007 17:50:15.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[E747F830:01C75B60] Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=echristley@nc.rr.com; dkim=neutral Thomas y Reina Jakits wrote: > Ernest, > > I agree, once you stop air-exchange on the inside it cannot rust a lot > for lack of oxygene. > > Question: "Rust Wars" - did you never prime or "SP-400" the frame > while assembling? > I know primer is just that, primer for paint and should not be > considered protection, but it is better than nothing? > Wiping with WD-40 helps, but comes fairly fast unless stuck with dust. > Also when you need to weld you have to clean extra well not have any > of the oils of WD-40 inthe weld area. > > Also just plainly painting the frame any cheap paint is good, > sand/grind/blast where you need to work and when all is finishes do > the one time for all blast/clean/etch/prime/paint/polish/IDKW ...... > > Thomas > "..not pulling your hair, just looking for arguments - I am still in > the plannig fase, so any and all mistakes you guys ever made and are > willing to tell, I hopefully will avoid! Thanx" > Wipe down with MEK before welding. I did prime part of the airplane using some Killz primer that I had on hand. It was advertised as being able to paint over oils and wax. I found it to be a royal pain to strip off to add more members. The WD-40 was settled on as a happy (or not so happy) compromise between protection and ease of removal. Needs occasional replenishment, but came off easily with the MEK. It just required a lot of extra attention in the summer months. It was about 4 years from the first cut till I put the finish paint on the fuselage. -- ,|"|"|, Ernest Christley | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta Builder | o| d |o http://ernest.isa-geek.org |