Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #35784
From: <Lehanover@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] engine mount 4130 vs 304 SS
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:13:42 EST
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In a message dated 2/28/2007 9:12:01 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, rusty@radrotary.com writes:
Greetings,
 
As I ponder my choices for mounting the single rotor engine, I noticed something that surprised me.  304 stainless is cheaper than 4130 steel.  One thing that's always bothered me about steel tube type construction is the concern for rusting inside the tubes, so stainless is appealing.  There must be a catch here. 
 
Is there a good reason I should use 4130 instead of 304?  Either will likely be sized much larger than needed, since I don't have the means to do any proper analysis of the strength. 
 
Thanks,
Rusty (Autoflight drive supposed to be shipping next week)
 
 
 
The 4130 can be gas welded. It will last longer than you will, if it is dry inside when welded.
 
It is stronger than stainless in the same section.
 
You can wash the inside with Linseed oil and weld the hole shut when finished. Then it will outlast all of us. You can use scrap 4130 from aircraft salvage.
 
You can fix it anywhere there is a gas torch. Not just a TIG set. Rare at little airports.
 
Check the Dillsburg aeroplane co. In Dillsburg Pa. for best new prices.
 
Lynn E. Hanover




AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster