X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.152] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.2) with ESMTP id 1587979 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:01:11 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.148.227.152; envelope-from=rlwhite@comcast.net Received: from quail.site (c-68-35-160-229.hsd1.nm.comcast.net[68.35.160.229]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <20061121050039m1200kttf3e>; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:00:50 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:01:24 -0700 From: Bob White To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] N11XD First Flight report Message-Id: <20061120220124.3d4a037a.rlwhite@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.8.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Congratulations Jim, What a great first flight report. Bob W. (Maybe this week) On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:30:44 -0800 (PST) James Maher wrote: > On Saturday Nov 18,2006 around 2:00PM Dyke Delta N11XD finally took to th= e sky at Barnes Airport in Westfield MA (KBAF). > After a short takeoff roll she climbed out at 120 MPH at a rate of abou= t 1000 fpm. Once reaching the planned altitude of 3000 feet the aircraft wa= s leveled off and throttle reduced to about 5000 RPM (about =BD throttle) w= hich allowed an easy slow cruise at 120-130MPH. This was all with the IVO i= n-flight adjustable prop set to about 80 inches of pitch and 5 deg of T-tai= l setting. It was amazing to see all of the instruments come to life and be= working just as they were expected to. Especially the gyro instruments, wh= ich are driven by a Venturi, and therefore not tested before flight. Gentle= turns were performed to keep the aircraft above the airport and within rea= ch of its 9000 and 5000 foot runways. First 10 degrees of bank then 20 degr= ees. The engine ran smooth as silk with all temps and pressures in the gree= n. After several circles around the airport the T-tail was set to the neutr= al position and the nose did drop noticeably requiring a bit of retrimming = of the elevons. > The aircraft flew straight and level with no tendency to change heading = or pitch on its own (just like the other Deltas I have flown). The next tes= t was some slow flight to see just what happens as the aircraft slows down.= This was performed by reducing the power and airspeed in 5 MPH increments = and getting a feel for the controls at each reduced speed. I started at 120= MPH and by the time it got down to 95 the controls required a bit more move= ment but it was easy to hold level flight at this speed. The aircraft did n= ot feel as though it was on the verge of a stall or get mushy or show any t= endency to descend. This told me that it would not be an issue to land. I t= hen climbed to 4000 feet and made a simulated downwind entry. When abeam th= e numbers I reduce power to 3500 RPM set the airplane into a descent at 120= MPH. I was descending at 1000 FPM and reached 3000 feet before even being = able to turn base! Good thing I was still at 3000 feet. As I discovered, th= at throttle > setting would not work. So, I pushed the throttle back in and climbed ba= ck to 4000 feet for another try. Back on simulated downwind abeam the numbe= rs again, the throttle reduced to 4300 RPM this time. At this point the rat= e of descent was a much more acceptable 500 FPM at 120 MPH. I turned simula= ted base at about 3700 feet and turned simulated final at about 3500 feet. = This felt much better except that I turned base too soon and no sooner than= I turned final I was over the end of the simulated runway=85 way too high.= After about a half dozen of these simulated approaches from 4000 feet to 3= 000 feet I felt comfortable enough with the settings that I could make a la= nding successfully. Since I had been flying for almost an hour and it was c= old up there and the sun was beginning to set it was time to come back down= . I called the tower and informed them that I wished to enter the downwind = for Runway 2 from above. I was asked to report on final for runway 2, with = winds from 330 at > 6 knots. As I was gently spiraling down from 3000 feet, at 500 FPM, to b= e at the pattern altitude of 1300 feet, I was treated to watch a pair of A1= 0=92s return from their war-games and land below me. Downwind was entered a= nd flown at 120 MPH. Just like I practiced above, power was reduced abeam t= he numbers to setup 500 FPM descent at 120 MPH. This time I waited the righ= t amount of time and distance before turning base. (The pattern looks a bit= different at 4000 feet than it does at 1000 agl. This was much more comfor= table.) Base was turned at about 1000 feet (700agl) and then the turn to fi= nal at about 750 (500agl) feet and a call to the tower. Every thing happens= quick at 120 MPH but it all felt so right. On final I felt I was a bit low= so a tweak of throttle was added and speed reduced to 110MPH with the rate= of descent still at 500 fpm. Once the right glide was established and the = runway looked like it was close enough the throttle was reduced back to abo= ut the setting it > was before turning final. I began to flare and just as I did the ground = effect cushion kicked in and the aircraft ballooned up a few feet. So, I ju= st kept gently pulling back on the stick as I was trained, (resisting the u= rge to lower the nose), and the airplane gently settled back down and touch= ed down on the main gear first and the nose came down as I continued to pul= l back on the stick, trying to keep the nose light. I was down in 2000-3000= feet and then had to taxi another =BD mile to exit the runway at its mid p= oint so I did not even need to use the brakes until reaching the taxiway tu= rn off. I taxied back to the hangar, to my anxiously awaiting friends who f= irst congratulated me and then asked why I took so long to come back down. = I was just having so much fun I didn=92t want to come down. The flight coul= d not have gone any better and the aircraft and engine could not have perfo= rmed more flawlessly than they did. After almost 11 years in the making and= over 8000 hours of > building time this was the day I dreamed of and it was better than I eve= r imagined. Although I did the vast majority of the work myself I could not= have built and flown this airplane alone. I was fortunate to have the help= and motivation of many friends and fellow aviators to sustain my efforts o= ver the many years. A few of them were there to support my first flight eff= ort as well and this was immensely helpful to me. My only regret is that th= e project took so long that some of those who helped, did not live long eno= ugh to witness this flight. I=92m sure that they were watching over me from= a bit higher altitude. I hope I can encourage those who are still building= to keep up with their effort. It is all worth it in the end. I am looking = forward to many more hours of uneventful flying. > =20 > Jim Maher > Dyke Delta N11XD (1 hour) > Atkins 13b rotary and short intake, with RWS EC2 and Ross PRSU. > =20 > p.s.=20 > Tracy, > I know that I never made your on-line builder's list, > but now you can put me on your "flying customers" list. > I'd certainly appreciate one of those buttons too if you have any left. > Thanks, > Jim >=20 --=20 N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 - http://www.bob-white.com First engine start 1/7/06 - Special Airworthiness Certificate 10/1/06 Cables for your rotary installation - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/