X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <cbeazley@innovista.net>
Received: from mx2-2.spamtrap.magma.ca ([209.217.78.161] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.1)
  with ESMTPS id 1502617 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:45:32 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.217.78.161; envelope-from=cbeazley@innovista.net
Received: from mail2.magma.ca (mail2.internal.magma.ca [10.0.10.12])
	by mx2-2.spamtrap.magma.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k9P5j6qM031305
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:45:06 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.101] (CPE006067657509-CM014110005316.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [72.139.119.150])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by mail2.magma.ca (Magma's Mail Server) with ESMTP id k9P5j5DP003141
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:45:06 -0400
Message-ID: <453F0161.8090204@innovista.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 02:17:05 -0400
From: cbeazley <cbeazley@innovista.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Subject: Flywheel machining and minimum inertia
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-magma-MailScanner-Information: Magma Mailscanner Service
X-magma-MailScanner: Clean
X-Spam-Status: 

Hi Again;

Can a stock cast iron? flywheel be machined/lightened?
Are there any material problems other than standard 
strength/thickness/balance?

Does anyone, Lynn?, have any comments regarding the minimum flywheel inertia
in order to provide a stable idle and minimize the effects of torque pulses?

Thanks
Cary