Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #33890
From: Joe Hull <joeh@pilgrimtech.com>
Subject: RE: ***SPAM*** [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust Update
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:03:29 -0700
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Ah, I hadn’t thought about that. But I don’t normally use AvGas.  The only time I have used it was on my attempted trip to OSH. So I have about 10 hrs on AvGas total. I’ll keep that in mind during my problem solving (assuming there is a problem).

 

Thanx,

Joe

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:14 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: ***SPAM*** [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust Update

 

Hi Joe, great to hear the improvements.

 

By the way, I can't recall whether you use much 100LL, but if you do and have anything over 10-15 hours on the spark plugs, your EGT drop MIGHT be sparkplug SAG.  If you use only mogas then unlikely.

 

Ed

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Joe Hull

Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:40 PM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Exhaust Update

 

Friends and others,

As you may recall, on the way to Osh on July 23 my exhaust system decided to depart the engine leaving a lot of melted wires and charred cowling. I got it tacked back together and raced home to Seattle from western Nebraska. Once home I began the process of doing a permanent repair of the wires and developing a new exhaust system. The wires were the easy part. The exhaust system has been a long arduous process in which I pursued several options.

 

In the end I mocked up a design using 1 ½” and 2” Sched 40 ABS plumbing pipe; not quite the exact dimensions for 2” and 2.5” ID x .049 stainless– but close enough. I sent the model off to Aircraft Exhaust in Princeton, Minnesota and a mere 4-5 weeks later I got my finished exhaust system. I had them put a couple of “ball joints” in right after the first bend about half-way to the merge. Also, the model was designed, and I emphasized with them over the phone, that each leg was to be pretty close to (exactly?) 21” from the flange to the merge (per Lynn Hanover’s advice).

 

I received the exhaust 2 weeks ago. Getting it on the plane was a breeze. Unfortunately designing and fabricating a support system for it, so it is firmly braced to the engine, and fabricating a stainless heat shield took 24 or more hours! Since the airport is 50 miles away that’s a lot of work and has taken 2 full Saturdays!

 

Anyway, my efforts were rewarded late Saturday when I finally got it all together and began testing. I ran the engine on the ground at low RPM (1200-2000) while the oil warmed up. After the oil was above 120 deg. I did a static test and was rewarded with another 200 RPM.

 

Oh, let me backup a minute. While the engine was down – waiting for the new exhaust I decided to re-do my intake manifold. I have the short Atkins manifold and had a plenum attached directly to the TWM throttle body – with nice sharp edges butting up to the throttle body (hey I didn’t know!). So I created some 11” long intake tubes that flare to a “sort-of” bell mouth inside my air-cleaner plenum. I tested that briefly with the old muffler and on the ground got another 100-150 RPM static and another 200-300 RPM in the air – up to 5400RPM and another 3-5kts airspeed (162kts). So that was a win.

 

OK, back to the new exhaust – I was not getting 4400-4500 RPM static and after running for 20 minutes or so and checking to make sure everything was still secure – I decided to take to the skies before it got totally dark. There was a very noticeable improvement in takeoff and climb – VERY NOTICEABLE.  So I headed out west of the airport over Puget Sound and opened it up to see what would happen. It shot past 162kts and settled in around 179kts and about 5950 RPM!! Which is also pretty close to the design speed of the prop! So, overall it looks like I have some significant performance gains!!

 

Around the end of the flight (or actually the cause of the end), I thought I felt a little change in vibration and it looked like the EGT’s went down – so I hightailed it back to the airport at reduced power (of course descending even at reduced power meant I was still moving at 200MPH) and had an uneventful landing and taxi back to the hangar. I didn’t have time to pull the cowls – but everything I could see from the outside looked OK. So, I have to see whether the problem was in my head or in the engine!!

 

Attached are some pics of the model and the new exhaust. The “NewExhaust2” picture also shows the new intake in the upper right corner.

 

Performance Re-cap:

                        Static RPM     Flying RPM      Max Speed

Original               4100                 5150(max)       157kts TAS

New Intake          4250                 5400               162kts TAS

New Exhaust       4500                 5950               179kts TAS

 

Obviously the Tangential muffler sucks (actually blows) when it comes to performance! WAY too much back pressure.

 

Regards,

Joe Hull

Cozy Mk-IV N31CZ (65 hrs - Rotary 13B NA)

Redmond (Seattle), Washington

 

 


--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster