|
Please include me as well, thank you. Yvon. geryvon@videotron.ca
----- Original Message ----- From: "Donald Willard Garrett" <nospam@avamail.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 3:40 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: ducted fan questions
Hey! If you are taking this offline, please cc me!
Donald Garrett flyrotaryNOspam@avamail.net
Richard Sohn wrote:
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Russell Duffy <mailto:russell.duffy@gmail.com>
*To:* Rotary motors in aircraft <mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
*Sent:* Sunday, September 17, 2006 6:12 PM
*Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: ducted fan questions
ing a ducted fan(not a shrouded propeller). Now that's just way too cool Richard :-) Was the fan running directly off the engine, with no redrive? Did
you feel that the performance was better than it would have
been with a traditional redrive and prop? If I get serious about
trying this, I'll certainly take you up on your offer to share
info. Cheers,
Rusty
There are plenty of ducted fans, look at the bypass stage of every
turbofan engine. The difference between a ducted fan and a
shrouded propeller is the blade solidity. This is the ratio of the
fan cross section to the total blade area. A turbofan is around
"1" and a shrouded propeller, I have seen, may be as low as .1 or
less.
My fan with the KAWA engine was running reduced at 3400RPM, in
order to allow for more solidity with the benefit of lower noise.
When I changed to direct drive with adjusted solidity at the same
HP, the fan efficiency went from 70% down to less then 50%, and
the noise was almost unbearable.
The fan I flew had six blades, and the test fan on direct drive
had three blades, which were smaller too.
BTW the diameter was 26".
The conclusion is, if you aim for a solidity of 1, or close to 1,
for a given hp, there is only one fan size and RPM. Now, what
compromises can be made to arrive at a practical design? Your
imagination, and expectations, are the only limits.
My 90+hp design has nine blades at 26", giving a solidity of .6 .
This is not very good, however, I do not want to make a new shroud
and I also have a given max RPM, which locks me in. Nevertheless,
the data would be as good as any, knowing the deficiencies.
So much for now.
Should we discuss this on another E-Mail? I don't want to bore our
rotor head friends.
Richard Sohn
N-2071U
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
|
|