X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1332341 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:34:41 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Aug 2006 09:33:39 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.08,125,1154923200"; d="scan'208"; a="96892833:sNHT30233036" Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7FDXd8M015380 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:33:39 -0400 Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k7FDXdh5011374 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:33:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:33:39 -0400 Received: from [64.102.38.136] ([64.102.38.136]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:33:38 -0400 Message-ID: <44E1CD32.2050304@nc.rr.com> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:33:38 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] RWS EM-2 tips wanted.. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2006 13:33:38.0467 (UTC) FILETIME=[6A57A730:01C6C06F] Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=echristley@nc.rr.com; dkim=neutral David Staten wrote: > > Also.. just a little feedback.. for Tracy (cause I know he will read > this eventually).. basing this suggestion on something someone > attributed to Al Wick on reducing human factors. On the back of the > EM2.. there is a 15 pin dsub and two 25 pin dsubs.. with the > admonition not to get the connectors mixed up. If mixing up the > connectors would cause failure of a smoke test (let the smoke out, and > the box doesnt work anymore)... then wouldnt it be a good idea for > future generations of this device have non-compatible connectors for > the various plugs? Like a 37 pin in lieu of one of the 25's.. or one > 25 pin being male and the other 25 pin being female? I'm not trying to > complicate your world, but something like this MIGHT reduce one > possible link in the chain of failure. That being said, i dont even > know if this is a solution for a problem that hasnt manifested itself. > Whittle you a pin out of some hard plastic. Stick it in a unused hole on the plug side of one of the connectors, and remove the corresponding pin on it's mate. Whittle another plastic pin and plug a hole in a different spot on the other side. Be careful not to be rough when plugging in. This technique is used a lot in electronics. It allows for the same connector to be used in many places, keeping the parts count lower. This is a major concern, especially when you're doing such small runs as the EM2. Another solution is to cut a spacer to fit between the plugs and then tape/bolt/epoxy them together so that they go in and out as one unit. -- ,|"|"|, Ernest Christley | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta Builder | o| d |o http://ernest.isa-geek.org |