X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com ([66.249.82.203] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1320544 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:18:41 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.249.82.203; envelope-from=cozy4pilot@gmail.com Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i26so1459313wxd for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:17:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:importance:x-mimeole:in-reply-to; b=lL8EHMwK3qPE0VJhQAFYbRx/0Ry6XgahYARfa0vUu/MgKx2rDv3bKaMubKFtx4UAXiPqveppeLv2ZiZ+hC4vVpoiGHRHunvTwBQIRhMcIFKN3flQl71hzt8IIiNRoXonUh+m7jHU59mL0/W08Pg5F2UqQ3j07oojYflMEaHzEvA= Received: by 10.70.34.17 with SMTP id h17mr2575814wxh; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from stevehome ( [71.55.75.37]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i38sm15346103wxd.2006.07.28.09.17.54; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:17:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "Steve Brooks" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Test Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:18:05 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 In-Reply-To: Ed, The only other comment I could make in favor of the turbo, is that it's suppose to provide increased fuel economy, even at low boost levels by improving the atomization of the fuel charge. I'm not sure about how true this is, but that is what I read somewhere along the line. I've had my T04 for about a year and a half now, but decided not to replace it until I got it moved. For one, the stock turbo hasn't given me any trouble, and it will require a fair amount of work to get it changed over. My turbo is the same identical turbo that Paul and Lou are running. It's a Garrett .96 A/r with an s-trim compressor. I'd like to have gone higher than the .96, but the exhaust side turbine gets really large if you go any bigger. Paul has had good luck so far with their turbo. I'm aware of the oil temperature problem. I had told him early on about my concerns when I first saw their set up. I told him about the problems that I had, and what it took to resolve it. They are now increasing the air flow to the cooler, and may go to 2 oil coolers depending on how their next test go. I'm sure hat they'll get it worked out. I rode in their plane on a fast taxi, and it is amazing how much power it has. As I recalled it dyno'd at 580 HP at 10lbs of boost. Their engine sounds like it is revving 10,000 RPM's when it throttles up, even though it is only 4-5 K. I guess that I'm used to the way mine sounds, and they have that additional rotor adding to the exhaust note. I can't wait to hear it fly. It should be interesting to say the least. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Ed Anderson Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:47 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Test Yep! I'm sitting here monitoring some remodeling contractors converting our garage to the wife's desires. But, tomorrow, I get to raise my hangar door frame!! Then I can put on the sheets and start configuring the hydraulic system that opens the doorl I'm afraid I agree with you Steve. The stock Mazda turbo simply was not designed for the operating stresses we are able to put on it. I believe if you use modest boost only for take off (short term) and not for cruise speed then it may last a decent amount of time, but that sort of defeats the idea of the turbo providing at least sea level NA type power for high altitude high speed cruise. I have two turbos sitting on my work bench - I've toyed with the idea on and off for years, but just couldn't convince myself that I needed one since I tend to cruise at lower airspeeds to keep the fuel burn and $$ down. If I needed some extra boost just for takeoff, I'd probably just go NO2. But, if I were to do a turbo, it would not be with the stock Mazda turbo but would use something like the TO4. Yes, I tend not to fly at all in the July August time frame - just too hot for me to enjoy. Of coursed, I could get up before the break of dawn and find some cooler air. But, I tend to do my tinkering during those months and fly starting September. Paul and Lou are working out some oil cooling issues before jumping into their test program in earnest. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Brooks" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:36 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Test > Hi Ed, > Things are kind of quiet with Oshkosh going on. I have been following the > thread on the exhaust issues with the mufflers. > > I still haven't decided whether to keep the turbo or not. I haven't had > any > trouble with mine, but I do believe that it is just a matter of time. I > also am very careful about how hard I push it. > > I have all of the parts to switch to a T04 turbo, except for the exhaust > pipe and heat shield. I think that I'd like to try it without the turbo > first, just to see how much power I have, and how much difference it makes > in the temps. The 30+ lbs savings in weight would also be a plus. I want > to see what kind of result that Buly gets running without a muffler. > Seems > like it would be pretty loud, but I may be wrong. > > Whatever I do, I'll probably do after I get the plane moved up to NC. I > have the hours flown off. I just need to fly it up here. August doesn't > provide the best flying weather though, so I'll probably wait until > September to make the move. > > Steve Brooks > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On > Behalf Of Ed Anderson > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:03 AM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Test > > > It works > > Ed > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Brooks" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 9:58 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Test > > >>I just changed my email address for Fly Rotary over to my Gmail account, >>and >> wanted to make sure that it is working. >> >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >> > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/