X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-m26.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1320012 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:15:06 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.7; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id q.416.6e9edc8 (43930) for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:14:16 -0400 (EDT) From: WRJJRS@aol.com Message-ID: <416.6e9edc8.31faf728@aol.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:14:16 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1154063656" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5027 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1154063656 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 7/27/2006 4:55:27 PM Pacific Standard Time, jskmberki@alltel.net writes: It looks like it might work for my application. I was wondering how much HP I would be giving up, plus the additional weight. On the positive side it may give up the heat slower and keep the under cowl tems lower plus it has to absorb some noise. P port won't work in this scenario either. Joe Berki Limo EZ Joe, Unless you engine mounts prevents P port the exhaust manifold wouldn't be a problem. Since the exhaust manifold is actually smaller if you use the stocker you could still P port. The intake seems to make more difference than the exhaust on the rotary. You certainly would lose some power, but it might be worth it. Bill Jepson -------------------------------1154063656 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 7/27/2006 4:55:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,=20 jskmberki@alltel.net writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>
It looks like it might work for my=20 application.  I was wondering how much HP I would be giving up, = plus=20 the additional weight.  On the positive side it may give up the heat=20 slower and keep the under cowl tems lower plus it has to absorb some noise= .=20  P port won't work in this scenario either.
 
Joe Berki
Limo EZ
<= /DIV>
Joe,
Unless you engine mounts prevents P port the exhaust manifold wouldn't=20= be a=20 problem. Since the exhaust manifold is actually smaller if you use the=20 stocker you could still P port. The intake seems to make more difference tha= n=20 the exhaust on the rotary. You certainly would lose some power, but it might= be=20 worth it.
Bill Jepson
-------------------------------1154063656--