X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.192.83] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1318723 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:25:41 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.192.83; envelope-from=rlwhite@comcast.net Received: from quail (c-68-35-160-229.hsd1.nm.comcast.net[68.35.160.229]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <20060727192450m1300mg184e>; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:24:55 +0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:26:11 -0600 From: Bob White To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: ***Edited*** [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust pipes Message-Id: <20060727132611.d3f148c2.rlwhite@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Joe, Can't you edit the subject before you send the reply? Bob W. On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:22:58 -0700 "Joe Hull" wrote: > Yes, it is annoying.the mail server is the one that is marking it. There is > apparently an automated weighting criteria and some people's posts hit the > "Spam" weighting limit.not exactly sure why. > > > > Here is the info in the SMTP header from the mail server: > > > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.2 tagged_above=0.0 required=6.0 tests=AWL, > > BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE, MSGID_DOLLARS, RATWARE_MS_HASH, > > RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME > > > > Joe Hull > > Cozy Mk-IV N31CZ (65 hrs - Rotary 13B NA) > > Redmond (Seattle), Washington > > > > _____ > > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On > Behalf Of Dale Rogers > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:21 AM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: ***SPAM*** [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust pipes > > > > Joe, > > Any idea why your mailer is marking Ed's message as "***spam***"? > The original from Ed wasn't like that - only your reply to it. Leaving > it the subject field is causing it to be flagged at my end, and I have to > rescue it from the "junk" folder. > > Dale R. > > > > Ed, > > Are the pipes supported anywhere but at the flange? > > > > Joe Hull > > Cozy Mk-IV N31CZ (65 hrs - Rotary 13B NA) > > Redmond (Seattle), Washington > > > > _____ > > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On > Behalf Of Ed Anderson > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 5:34 AM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: ***SPAM*** [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust pipes > > > > > -- > > > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > > > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > -- http://www.bob-white.com N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (first engine start 1/7/06) Custom Cables for your rotary installation - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/