X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1137945 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:26:49 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.68.10.87; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from sj-dkim-6.cisco.com ([171.68.10.81]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Jun 2006 10:25:54 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,204,1146466800"; d="scan'208"; a="287909421:sNHT39599520" Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by sj-dkim-6.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k52HPsLY005184 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:25:54 -0700 Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k52HPrcL025236 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:25:53 -0400 Received: from [64.102.38.136] ([64.102.38.136]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:25:53 -0400 Message-ID: <448074A1.8090207@nc.rr.com> Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:25:53 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Prop design speed References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2006 17:25:53.0162 (UTC) FILETIME=[997FDEA0:01C68669] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-6.cisco.com; header.From=echristley@nc.rr.com; dkim=neutral Bill Bradburry wrote: >Joe Hull says: >Snip... >"Thanx Ed. I have a 64"Dia. x 76" pitch prop. It's supposed to be cruise >prop >that is designed for 190HP and 220MPH. But you're right, it's too early >to >be cutting on the prop." > >OK, here is where I demonstrate my ignorance... >My rough calculations, with an estimated 20% slip, says this prop with a >76" pitch, is good for 121 MPH with a 2.85 drive and 160 MPH with a 2.17 >drive assuming a 6000 RPM cruise??? >Where am I going wrong? > >Bill Bradburry > > >-- >Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > For 2.85: 6000 RPM / 2.85 = 2105.263157894737 RPM (at the prop) 2105.263157894737 R/M * 76 I/R * .8 = 128000 inch per minute 128000 I/M / 12 I/FT / 5280 FT/Mile * 60 M/Hour = 121.21 MPH For 2.17 6000 RPM / 2.17 = 2764.976958525346 RPM (at the prop) 2764.976958525346 R/M * 76 I/R * .8 = 168110.599078341 inch per minute 168110.599078341 I/M / 12 I/FT / 5280 FT/Mile * 60 M/Hour = 159.2 MPH Looks like your numbers are on target, but isn't 20% slip rather large? -- ,|"|"|, Ernest Christley | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta Builder | o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org |