Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.68.10.86; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <44771F81.2070009@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:32:17 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: per Ed's request
References: <list-1129016@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1129016@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Kelly Troyer wrote:

> Jim and Ernest,
>      Jim I also thank you for your valid concern and input........The 
> NACA report
> that has provided much of the design info for our "in wing" cooling 
> systems has
> reported a slight increase in lift with certain outlet 
> positions.......Believed to be the result of reattachment of the 
> boundry layer after going turbulent aft of the outlet.....


In case you want to review it, the report Kelly refers to can be found at:
http://ernest.isa-geek.org/Delta/Library/naca-report-WingRadiators.pdf

And while I was retrieving that one for the upteenth time, I found 
another that I hadn't read before:
http://ernest.isa-geek.org/Delta/Library/naca-report-WingDuctCooling.pdf


-- 
         ,|"|"|,               Ernest Christley     |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----     Dyke Delta Builder    |
        o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |