Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.71.176.78; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <445F47C3.5050907@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 09:29:39 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: oil cooler lines
References: <list-1095324@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1095324@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bob White wrote:

>I did some measurements of flow rate with two different viscosity's of
>fluids with an EWP.  Counter intuitive as it may seem, I found no
>difference in flow rate between viscosity's of 1.3 cp and 5.3 cp.
>
>  
>
Possible explanation.  If the EWP motors are the permanent magnet type 
motors, they will have a certain RPM that they want to maintain, and 
they will draw enough current to do that until they burn themselves up.  
Is this right, Bill D.?  Could be that the higher viscosity fluid had 
the same flow but would be drawing significantly more juice to do it.

-- 
         ,|"|"|,               Ernest Christley     |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----     Dyke Delta Builder    |
        o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |