X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-m28.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1096211 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 May 2006 08:56:37 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.9; envelope-from=BMears9413@aol.com Received: from BMears9413@aol.com by imo-m28.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id q.3fa.1a99f20 (15874) for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:55:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from FWM-R13 (fwm-r13.webmail.aol.com [152.163.211.141]) by air-id07.mx.aol.com (vx) with ESMTP id MAILINID71-3e02445f3fcf21b; Mon, 08 May 2006 08:55:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:56:02 -0400 Message-Id: <8C840B5E5767550-1548-5169@FWM-R13.sysops.aol.com> From: bmears9413@aol.com References: Received: from 65.182.71.8 by FWM-R13.sysops.aol.com (152.163.211.141) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 08 May 2006 08:56:02 -0400 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 17385 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: oil cooler lines Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MailBlocks_8C840B5E5767550_1548_5194_FWM-R13.sysops.aol.com" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net X-AOL-IP: 152.163.211.141 X-Spam-Flag: NO ----------MailBlocks_8C840B5E5767550_1548_5194_FWM-R13.sysops.aol.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hmmmm.....havent really thought of that. Thats a consideration. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Kelly Troyer To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:53:54 +0000 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: oil cooler lines In a message dated 5/5/2006 9:04:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, BMears9413@aol.com writes: I'm running two oil coolers in the Spitfire. Due to the length of the lines and volume of the two coolers I reduced my oil lines to AN-8 (I think stock they were 10?) Now, before I close everything up I'm having second guessing. My total line length will be around 12'. I had planned on running the lines to one oil cooler, then the other, then back to the motor. Any comments? Bob Mears Bob, Would your installation be able to use 5052 tubeing for any of your straight oil line runs to cut down on the weight and expense of using hose for the entire system ? Kelly Troyer ----------MailBlocks_8C840B5E5767550_1548_5194_FWM-R13.sysops.aol.com Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hmmmm.....havent really thought of that. Thats a consideration.

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly Troyer <keltro@att.net>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:53:54 +0000
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: oil cooler lines

In a message dated 5/5/2006 9:04:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, BMears9413@aol.com writes:

I'm running two oil coolers in the Spitfire. Due to the length of the lines and volume of the two coolers I reduced my oil lines to AN-8 (I think stock they were 10?) Now, before I close everything up I'm having second guessing. My total line length will be around 12'. I had planned on running the lines to one oil cooler, then the other, then back to the motor.

Any comments?

Bob Mears

Bob,

Would your installation be able to use 5052 tubeing for any of your straight

oil line runs to cut down on the weight and expense of using hose for the entire

system ?

Kelly Troyer

----------MailBlocks_8C840B5E5767550_1548_5194_FWM-R13.sysops.aol.com--