X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [201.225.225.167] (HELO cwpanama.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 975794 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 08:48:31 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.167; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net Received: from [201.224.93.110] (HELO usuarioq3efog0) by frontend1.cwpanama.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 59688709 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:00:37 -0500 Message-ID: <001201c62d7f$7bdbb290$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0> From: "rijakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Six port bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 08:48:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000E_01C62D55.925C7240" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C62D55.925C7240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I see.... Lighten the Rotors, Dynamic balance - in any case.... Smack on a Turbo/Intercooler - P-Port and keep it nice and low with the RPM! Thanks for the info... TJ ----- Original Message ----- From: Ed Anderson To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:26 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six port bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8) Having the older 13B, which was redline in the auto at 7500 rpm, I would certainly not feel comfortable with a higher rpm under continuous operation. Now, with lightened rotors and dynamic balancing, I might reconsider {:>) Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: rijakits To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 6:34 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six port bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8) I am rooting for his success - naturally I would only run 8000 rpm with his intake on my older 13B, but I would be happy with that {:>) Ed. Why not 9000 rpm? Thomas J. ("TJ") ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C62D55.925C7240 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I see....
Lighten the Rotors, Dynamic balance - in any=20 case....
Smack on a Turbo/Intercooler - P-Port and keep = it nice and=20 low with the RPM!
Thanks for the info...
 
TJ
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ed=20 Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, = 2006 11:26=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six = port bolt-on=20 manfold progress (was: RX-8)

Having the older 13B, which was redline in the = auto at=20 7500 rpm, I would certainly not feel comfortable with a higher rpm = under=20 continuous operation.  Now, with lightened rotors and dynamic = balancing,=20 I might reconsider {:>)
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 rijakits
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, = 2006 6:34=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Six = port=20 bolt-on manfold progress (was: RX-8)

 
I am rooting for his success - naturally I = would=20 only run 8000 rpm with his intake on my older 13B, but I would be = happy=20 with that {:>)
 
Ed.
 
Why not 9000 = rpm?
 
Thomas J.=20 = ("TJ")
------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C62D55.925C7240--